Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
pernot [2019/05/04 18:41] rayner.cheung [2009] |
pernot [2019/08/15 18:07] rayner.cheung [2009] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** ( Nov 2016) fabulous wine [b.henry] | * **Batard Montrachet** ( Nov 2016) fabulous wine [b.henry] | ||
* **Bienvenues- Batard Montrachet** ( Dec 2016) excellent, no problems here [b.henry] | * **Bienvenues- Batard Montrachet** ( Dec 2016) excellent, no problems here [b.henry] | ||
- | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Folatières"** (Nov. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized. Quite pale yellow color. Somewhat austere & reduced. Best decanted, allowing the floral elements to emerge. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. This wine has barely evolved since purchase when a trial btl was consumed (4/2011). [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Folatières"** (Nov. 2018 – ): 4 btls not oxidized. Quite pale yellow color. Somewhat austere & reduced. Best decanted, allowing the floral elements to emerge. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. This wine has barely evolved since its purchase when a trial btl was consumed. [Rayner Cheung] |
- | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"** (Dec. 2018 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Slightly riper than the Folatières, but still quite reduced with an indistinct nose & a modestly pleasurable palate. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"** (Dec. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized. Riper than the Folatières, with a classically Burgundian nose that turns floral, almost like a top Condrieu. White–fleshed fruits on the lovely palate. Hints of orange blossom also. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] |