Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sauzet [2019/05/06 13:57] adrian [2008] |
sauzet [2019/06/11 19:20] rayner.cheung [2006] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | ||
| - | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 4 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather stiff grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 5 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather stiff grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
| * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
| Line 357: | Line 357: | ||
| * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | * **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019): not oxidized, taught, mineral, austere, super (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| + | * **Puligny Combettes** (May 2019): after the Referts & Perrieres. Another odd bottle, the darkest colour (just) of the 3. No obvious pox, but just tatses of caramel, flat, no fruit or minerality or lift. Very advanced - certainly way below par (again)? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| + | |||
| ===== 2009 ===== | ===== 2009 ===== | ||
| * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer) | ||