Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
— |
ambroise_bertrand [2018/03/14 12:41] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Background information ====== | ||
+ | \\ No background information.\\ \\ | ||
+ | ====== Wines ====== | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ===== 1994 ===== | ||
+ | * **Corton Charlemagne** (9 May 2009): not oxidized, great fruit driven nose, ripe and balanced. Best bottle until now (10th from 12) | ||
+ | ===== 1995 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Corton Charlemagne** (27 July 2008): not oxidized, very young and took a while to open up [Keith Akers] | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | ===== 1996 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Corton Charlemagne** (11 Feb 2006): not oxidized, great bottle [Arjan Damman] | ||
+ | * **Ladoix "Les Grechons"** (Sept 2005): Not oxidized, young, bright, balanced [Frank Drew] | ||
+ | * **Ladoix "Les Grechons"** (Jan 2008): Not oxidized, very fresh, bright, good concentration [Frank Drew] | ||
+ | ===== 2000 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Corton Charlemagne** (6 Jun 2008): oxidized. This was the sixth bottle of 2000 that I opened during the last 2 months. All of them were oxidized. Two more to go... :-( [Paul Miserez] | ||
+ | * **Meursault "Les Vireuils"** (7 Jun 2008): not oxidized. Great villages [Paul Miserez] |