Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
ballot_millot [2020/01/06 18:42] rayner.cheung [2010] |
ballot_millot [2020/05/08 00:57] rayner.cheung [2010] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| * In vintage 2010: Free SO2 target at bottling is 35 ppm; also uses approximately 800 mg of CO2 (which is much higher than most producers -- see Le Moine for another example) | * In vintage 2010: Free SO2 target at bottling is 35 ppm; also uses approximately 800 mg of CO2 (which is much higher than most producers -- see Le Moine for another example) | ||
| + | * In vintage 2017: (per William Kelley of the Wine Advocate) Ballot Millot now has a target of 40 ppm of free SO2 | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| ===== 2004 ===== | ===== 2004 ===== | ||
| Line 16: | Line 17: | ||
| ===== 2010 ===== | ===== 2010 ===== | ||
| - | * **Meursault–Perrières** (Jan. 2020 – ): 1 btl oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The good btl had a subtle bouquet & tasted quite young & minerally. Decanting would help. From 3 btls purchased at retail in Hong Kong in Sep. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Meursault–Perrières** (Jan. 2020 – May 2020): 1 btl oxidized + 2 btl not oxidized. The good btls had a subtly delicate bouquet of white flowers & peach, & tasted quite young & minerally. From 3 btls purchased at retail in Hong Kong in Sep. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] |