Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
bonneau_du_martray [2018/03/14 12:41]
127.0.0.1 external edit
bonneau_du_martray [2020/02/12 09:50]
adrian [2006]
Line 222: Line 222:
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (December 2011) Oxidation well underway; fell apart after 2 hours opening. [Greg Munyard]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (December 2011) Oxidation well underway; fell apart after 2 hours opening. [Greg Munyard]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Oct & Dec 2014): Replacement bottles from domaine (see above); no premox, perfect (Adrian Latimer)   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Oct & Dec 2014): Replacement bottles from domaine (see above); no premox, perfect (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (JUly 2019): lovely (Adrian Latimer)
 +
 ===== 2001 ===== ===== 2001 =====
  
Line 232: Line 234:
   * **Corton Charlemagne**(Dec 31 2012) beautiful wine, no oxidation(b.henry)   * **Corton Charlemagne**(Dec 31 2012) beautiful wine, no oxidation(b.henry)
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Dec 2015) oxidized (R DeAngelo)   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Dec 2015) oxidized (R DeAngelo)
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne**(JUly 2019): remarkable pale green colour, amazingly fresh & young!(Adrian Latimer)
 +
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 2002 ===== ===== 2002 =====
Line 265: Line 269:
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Aug 2014): 2nd bottle, not oxidized [R Younger]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Aug 2014): 2nd bottle, not oxidized [R Younger]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( March 2015), slight pre-mox, just a little on the nose [b.henry]   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( March 2015), slight pre-mox, just a little on the nose [b.henry]
-  * **Corton Charlemagne** (Oct. 2015 – ) 11 btls not oxidized & greatly enjoyed by a number of experienced palates. 1 or 2 btls felt advanced, but were still very enjoyable. Btls in Oct. 2016 Apr. 2017 were simply superb: powerful wines on the mark. From an OWC purchased from a reputable West Coast retailer'​s auction platform in Jul. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]\\ \\ +  * **CortonCharlemagne** (Oct. 2015 – Jun. 201812 btls not oxidized & greatly enjoyed by a number of experienced palates. 1 or 2 btls felt advanced, but were still very enjoyable. Btls in Oct. 2016Apr. 2017, & Jun. 2018 were simply superb: powerful wines on the mark. From an OWC purchased from a reputable West Coast retailer'​s auction platform in Jul. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]\\ \\ 
 ===== 2003 ===== ===== 2003 =====
  
Line 297: Line 301:
   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( march 2017) severely reduced, not as bad as Nov 15,16 [b.henry]   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( march 2017) severely reduced, not as bad as Nov 15,16 [b.henry]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( April 2017) severely reduced, again sulphur is less that Nov 15,Nov 16) [b.henry]   * **Corton Charlemagne** ( April 2017) severely reduced, again sulphur is less that Nov 15,Nov 16) [b.henry]
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2018) not as heavily reduced as above bottles, opened and decanted 5 hrs before drank, ok![b.henry]
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (June 2018, Apr 2019) x 3 - not ox, only touch reductive, young and fresh, super, hurrah! (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (Oct 2019) alas back to normal, poxed... (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (July 2018) not oxidized, well balanced but a little underwhelming [Joel Singer]
 ===== 2006 ===== ===== 2006 =====
  
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (August 2015): not oxidized, not bad at all [ER]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (August 2015): not oxidized, not bad at all [ER]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (August 2015): not oxidized, still young [Adrian Latimer]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (August 2015): not oxidized, still young [Adrian Latimer]
-  * **Corton Charlemagne** (Feb 2018): ​dead, 1 not [Adrian Latimer]+  * **Corton Charlemagne** (Feb-April ​2018): ​dead, 1 not [Adrian Latimer] 
 +  * **Corton–Charlemagne** (Oct. 2018 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Surprisingly pale straw color for a 12 year old wine. Pinpoint bouquet of orchard fruits & smokey citrus. Richer on the palate than most white Burgundies (especially for a Corton Charlemagne),​ but the superb acidity structure & mineral balance keeps the refreshment coming. From a lot of 3 purchased from a reputable West Coast retailer'​s auction platform in Aug. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] 
 +* **Corton Charlemagne** (Feb 2020): ripe but good [Adrian Latimer] 
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 2007 ===== ===== 2007 =====
Line 310: Line 321:
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Dec 2015): not oxidized, but heavily sulphured, double decanting it 2 hrs ahead made it ok to drink[b.henry]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Dec 2015): not oxidized, but heavily sulphured, double decanting it 2 hrs ahead made it ok to drink[b.henry]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Mar 2017): not oxidized, a bit too 2007 to my taste [ER]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (Mar 2017): not oxidized, a bit too 2007 to my taste [ER]
 +
 +
 +
 +===== 2008 =====
 +
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** ( April 2018), lovely wine, no pre mox, no obvious sulphur!! [b.henry]
 +
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 2009 ===== ===== 2009 =====
  • bonneau_du_martray.txt
  • Last modified: 2022/06/09 03:19
  • by rayner.cheung