Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- carillon [2018/03/14 12:41]
+++ carillon [2018/03/14 12:41] (current)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== Background information ======
+  * General: wines spend 9-12 months in cask and then 3-6 months in stainless steel; grand crus typically get one year in oak and then 6 months in stainless steel.
+  * In vintage 1996: lees stirred weekly through ML completion.
+  * In vintage 1999: batonnage regime not disclosed.
+  * In vintage 2000: lees stirred every two weeks until the end of ML.
+  * In vintage 2002: "The wines were rich even from the start so we did a bit less bâtonnage than usual and other than the occasional stir, we essentially stopped altogether after the malos were complete."
+  * In vintage 2003: increased free SO2 level to 35-40 ppm per Steve Tanzer
+  * In vintage 2005: increased free SO2 level to 50 ppm per Steve Tanzer
+  * In vintage 2007: free SO2 level- 50 ppm
+===== Wines =====
+===== 1988 =====
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2016) absolutely stunning - needed air to get going (R DeAngelo)\\ \\
+===== 1993 =====
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (20 Mar 2007): not oxidized; took a while to open, but very impressive [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Apr 2015): not oxidized, showing well [J. Poell]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2016) not oxidized - fresh and youthful (R DeAngelo)
+===== 1995 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (28 Oct 2005): deep colour, very thin in the mouth. Very poor showing, clearly damaged, potentially premature oxidation [G Deschamps]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (05 Mar 2005): not oxidized, very young [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (June 2006): not oxidized, unctuous and at peak; will not likely improve, though will hold [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+===== 1996 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Dec 2005): no signs of oxidation, very young, brilliant [JE Simond]
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Sep 2006): badly oxidized [H Steininger]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep. 2007): not oxidized, fabulous wine [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Nov. 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Dec. 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Feb. 2008): not oxidised, quite fresh, high acidity [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jul 2010): not oxidised, nice wine [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Aug 2012): oxidised, disgusting [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Mar 2013): great, not ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2009): no signs of oxidation; nearing or at peak, though.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny** (Jun 2014): oxidized, though not totally unpleasant.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Sep 2004): no signs of oxidation [John Gilman]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Sep 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2006): no signs of oxidation, quite young still [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Sept 2007) oxidized [R DeAngelo]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Nov 2008): no signs of oxidation, a bit too much of the '96 acidity to my taste [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (March 2013): not oxidized; last bottle on a case [Paul Ferrari]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (May 2004): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Sep 2004): oxidized [John Gilman]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (May 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Aug 2005): very young, not oxidised at all [MAF Weiss]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2005): very young, not oxidized [R DeAngelo]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2005): very young/fine; not oxidized [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2005): very young, not oxidized [Mike During]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (10 Dec 2005): moderately oxidized, medium gold and fully mature [Stuart Roberts]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (October 2006): two recent bottles, both oxidized, barely drinkable [Stuart Roberts]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (June 2007): no signs of oxidation [ER], very fine
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (August 2007): completely oxidised [M.A.F.Weiss]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (8-25-2007): Not oxidized. Great bottle. [Nathan Vandergrift]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan 2008): oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (July 2008): fresh, not oxidized at all [MLee]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2009): still fresh, not oxidized at all [MLee]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (8-22-2008): Oxidized [Nathan Vandergrift]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct-Dec 2008): five bottles opened; one partially oxidized; the rest fabulous [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (May 2009): still very fine, no signs of oxidation at all [MLee]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (June 2009): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Aug 2010): fine; not oxidized at all [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Sep 2014):slightly oxidized; improved with air; not unpleasant and showing some Perrieres characteristics, but...clearly somewhat like sherry. [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2013): not ox, lovely aged WB [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2014): not ox, lovely aged WB [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (25 Jan. 2006): not oxidized, but medium gold color merits monitoring, see 96 tasting notes [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jul 2010): Not oxidised. Seems quite young [Gareth Miles]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jan 2012): Lovely aged WB [RB Engel]
+===== 1997 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Jan 2005): tasted: OK, decanted, tasted again after 2 hours --> moderately oxidized [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Oct 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Nov 2005): oxidised, tasted twice with consistent notes [JE Simond]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (May 2015): very advanced and not much more to give [J. Poell]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Dec 2005): not oxidised, still young [JE Simond]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan. 2008): not oxidised, very fresh, good [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [RAG]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan. 2008): rather oxidized, very flat, not drinkable [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2008): not oxidized, even a little austere [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2008): not oxidized, superb [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2008): completely oxidized [KT]
+===== 1998 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Dec 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (July 2007): no signs of oxidation but corked [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Dec. 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Dec. 2007): somewhat oxidized, very dark yellow, still drinkable [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan. 2008): completely oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (July. 2017): two bottles opened, both badly oxidized [MM]
+  * **Puligny** (Mar 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation, lovely [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny** (Oct 2007): oh no! Deep gold, totally dead nose, oxidised! [Paul Dellar]
+  * Puligny (Oct 2013): All (12) bottles oxidised, between barely drinkable and completely undrinkable [JP]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jul 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan. 2008): not oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (April 2008): corked bottle but not oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (April 2008): not oxidized , good [K.T.]
+  * Aishwarya Rai (May 2016) Me And [[http://www.masalascoop.com|Bollywood]] Superstar Salman Khan (The Real Father Of Child)
+===== 1999 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (Dec 2005): bleached cork, no noticable discolouration. No sign of oxidation [WK Choy]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep. 2007): oxideized but still enjoyable (barely) [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Sep 2007): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan. 2008): quite mature, rather yellow, but still good[K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2008): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (28 Apr 2008): not oxidized and excellent [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan 2010): tired, prepremox?; [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2010): not oxidized; an excellent, mature GC; [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (June 2010): not oxidized, mature and ready [Alan Weinberg]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (Sept 2010): not oxidized, wonderful and ready [J. Prandi]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (23 Feb 2011): a fabulous bottle. See 95-2000 Retrospective Notes. [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny** (Feb 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Dec 2005): no sign of oxidation [S Grant]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Jan 2007): no signs of oxidation and very good for a "village" [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Jan 2008): Not oxidized. Rather non-descript, though [Frank Drew]
+  * **Puligny** (Jan. 2008): not oxidized, but rather advanced [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny** (May 2008): Not oxidized, really quite good [Frank Drew]
+  * **Puligny** (June 2008) not oxidized, excellent villages (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny** (Feb 2009): no signs of oxidation, excellent for what it is [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Oct 2009): no signs of oxidation, excellent [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Mar 2010): no signs of oxidation, great village wine [Dana Gaiser]
+  * **Puligny** (Aug 2010): some reduction ;-) that disappeared swiftly, very good [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jul 2004): not oxidised [WK Choy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2006): not oxidised [B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2006): very youthful; no sign of oxidation; [B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2007): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Apr 2007): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Aug 2007): excellent bottle; not oxidised at all [B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2008): not oxidised, [KT]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Apr 2008): no signs of oxidation, pas mal; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Aug 2008): more advanced than other bottles but still quite good [B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2010): Vey good. [Paul Raiche]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (April 2012): Two bottles completely oxidized, one advanced. [P. ONeill]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (April 2012): Fourth bottle from a case, not oxidized, excellent. [P. ONeill]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Dec 2017): Completely oxidized [MM]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Jul 2007): not oxidised, fine and minerally [MLee]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2005): not oxidized, even still a bit dominated by oak and youthful, mineralty hidden [Rene Gleissner]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (July 2007): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan 2008): not oxydized [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan 2008): not oxydized [RAG]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2008): not oxydised, good [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2008): not oxydized [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Aug 2009): not oxidized, rich, slight oak, minerals, youthful [Hillard Sharf]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (May 2010): no signs of oxidation [ER], excellent
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jul 2010): no signs of oxidation, excellent [J. Prandi]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (April 2012): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2017): dark but not oxidized; delicious [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (27 Dec 2007): 1st bottle of a solid case: no signs of oxidation [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (19 Feb 2008): not oxidized [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Feb 2008): not oxidized, very good [KT]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Apr 2008): two more bottles, neither oxidized [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (May-Aug 2008): five more bottles, two partially oxidized [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Aug 2008): No oxidation, improved with time in the glass and bottle [Hillard Sharf]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (8 Mar 2009): not oxidized but fully mature [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Feb 2010): no signs of oxidation; nearing peak though. FWIW, cork was very pliable vis a vis those of other wines that night.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Sep 2011): no signs of oxidation; nearing peak, though it will hold at least till age 15.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jan 2013): no signs of oxidation; lovely wine; will hold at least till age 20.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Oct 2013): One bottle oxidised, one bottle slight oxidation (but drinkable), two bottles fine [JP]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Feb 2016): darkish color; apple juice taste. Not "right". But, not sherry and not unpleasant. Left in decanter overnight, and it was more honeyed and closer to what one would hope, though not totally "right". The next day of the experiment it was even better. Puzzling.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+===== 2000 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (27 Oct 2007): rather advanced for a grand cru [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (31 Dec 2007):badly oxidized [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2008):oxydised [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Aug 2008): no signs of oxidization, excellent [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (June 2009): oxidized [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (16 June 2011): two bottles, one US import: somewhat oxidized; one grey market: badly oxidized [Dana Gaiser]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (Jul 2012): Glorious, no ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard Montrachet** (Jun 2015): oxidized, such a shame for this benchmark BBM [Johan P]
+  * **Puligny** (Mar 2005):no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Nov 2005): no signs of oxidation [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny** (April 2006): no signs of oxidation (and very good for a village wine) [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (May 2007): lovely and fresh, a delight to drink [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2007**):** no signs of oxidation, extremely good for a village wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Nov 2007): Bright yellow, viscous, minerally, no oxidation, needs time [Hillard Sharf]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2008): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2008): significantly more advanced than last bottle but OK [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Dec 2007): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Dec. 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2008): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2008): badly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2008): not oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2008): oxidised [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2008): oxidized [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2009): an excellent mature 1er Cru, no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Les Combettes** (Dec 2007): moderate oxidation, way more in colour than palate [Andrew Hall]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Nov 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2006): no signs of oxidation; the wine lasted and improved for 2 days [Stuart BeauneHead Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2007): no oxidation [DaleW]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2007): no signs of oxidation (from magnum) [RAG]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Feb 2008): not oxidized, very advanced, but still good [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (July 2008): no signs of oxidation, very good [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (June 2008): no signs of oxidation, very good [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2009)**:** no signs of oxidation, nice wine [ER
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2008): no signs of oxidation (from magnum) [RAG]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Apr 2007): no signs of oxidation, still young [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jan 2008): very yellow, flat wine, slightly oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (March 2008): not oxidized, very good [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (May 2008): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (July 2008): signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Aug 2008): no signs of oxidation; [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Oct 2010): totally oxidized [Wes Jennison]
+===== 2001 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Jan. 2008): rather yellow, but very good wine [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2009): no signs of oxidation, excellent [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (10 Mar 2009): not oxidized. Excellent. See 2001 Tasting Notes, Part II [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (16 Dec 2010): not oxidized, but mature and well below the bottle in the 2009 tasting [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Oct 2011): not oxidized, but mature and decent but not great [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2011): no signs of oxidation, a much better wine after 3 hours, should I have waited another 5 years? ;-) [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2006): no signs of oxidation [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Sept 2009): no signs of oxidation, excellent village wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (May 2012): no signs of oxidation; young and vibrant and very appealing now.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny** (June 2012) oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny** (Apr 2015): no signs of oxidation; young and vibrant and very appealing now after long aeration. A wow wine..[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (December 2007): no sign of oxidation - excellent [B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (March 2008): no oxidation - very,very good [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2013) oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (November 2007): no sign of oxidation - lovely [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Feb 2009): no oxidation - lovely [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan 2010): not oxidised - very good [EW]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Sep 2007): no oxidation, very pure and stony [MLee**]**
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2008): oxidized [KT]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan 2012): oxidized [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jan 2008): dark yellow, oxidized [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (March 2008): not oxidized, very good [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (March 2011): not oxidized, excellent [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (April 2011): toast and bye bye. fully oxy. [WJ]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (3 May 2013): no signs of oxidation; the wine lasted and improved for 2 days; tres Puligny [Stuart BeauneHead Niemtzow]
+===== 2002 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (March. 2008): rather yellow, risks oxidation [K.T.]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Oct 2008): no signs of oxidization, excellent [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (18 Feb 2010): not oxidized. Excellent wine. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Two [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Dec 2010): no signs of oxidization, excellent [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (27 July 2006): no signs of oxidation, quite fresh and good [Michel Robert Abood]
+  * **Puligny** (April 2008): no sign of oxidation, but unfortunately corked [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny** (15 August 2008): not oxidised; fully mature [Jan-Tore Egge]
+  * **Puligny** (March 2009): not oxidised, and very good [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny** (Aug 2009): not oxidized, as always pretty good for a village wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (July 2011): not oxidized, mature, excellent for a village wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny** (Jun 2014 ): two bottles oxidized; third turned out fine, though seemed a little advanced at first. In fact, it was lovely. [Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Sep 2009): no signs of oxidation, a nice wine, as always [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jan 2011): No signs of oxidation. No signs of age either. [Martin B]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Feb 2009): more advanced than I would have expected, but not oxidized[B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (27 Nov 2009): excellent; not oxidized[B Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (September 2013): excellent, not oxidized [Howard Cooper]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2008): not oxidized, good [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (April 2013): not oxidized, very good [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (March 2008):early signs of oxidation [K.T.]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (May 2009): not oxidized and great stuff [Saviage]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (June- Dec 2009): five bottles, none oxidized and consistently top quality for a 1er. [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (4 Feb 2010): not oxidized and brilliant at the 2002 Tasting Night One. [Don Cornwell]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Aug 2012): not oxidized, nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Nov 2017):not oxidixed; quite mature and delicious.[Stuart BH Niemtzow]
+===== 2003 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Oct 2017): lightly oxidized [MM]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Aug 2007): no signs of oxidation, better than I had expected of a 2003 but for early drinking [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (May 2009): same as above [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Aug 2009): no signs of oxidation, lacks depth but still a nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (May 2008): no signs of oxidation, pleasant, not sure that it will still get better [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Feb 2010): no signs of oxidation, mighty good for 2003 [ER]
+  * **Puligny** **Perrieres** (Dec 2010): no signs of oxidation, nice wine in the context of 2003 [ER]
+===== 2004 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2014): not oxidized, great wine, may need another 2 years [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Jan 2014): Lovely, not ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2017): gave it the other 2 years mentioned above, oxidized ;-( [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Jan 2009): Not oxidized, fruit forward and tasty [Frank Drew]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Jan 2009): Not oxidized, a very pleasant village [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Mar 2010): Not oxidised, youthful and very good [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Jan 2012): Not oxidized, nice [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Dec 2014): Not oxidized, fresh and quite good. [Corey Miller]
+  * **Puligny Champ Canet** (Jan 2009): Not oxidized, classic young wine, excellent [Frank Drew]
+  * **Puligny Champ Canet** (Oct 2010): Not oxidized, pas mal [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champ Canet** (Jun 2011): Slight oxidative nose at first, but blossomed with air. Not oxidized. [Kurt]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Aug 2010): Not oxidized, beautiful wine [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2010): Not oxidized. Stunning bottle. [David Honig]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (31 Jan 2011): Not oxidized. Again great. [David Honig]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2011): Not oxidized, gorgeous [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2012): Not oxidized, excellent bottle [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Nov 2010): Early signs of oxydation (nose), still enjoyable but drink up. [Thomas Küntziger]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2014): Not oxidized, wonderful wine, wish I had more, more life left. [Stephen Dreher]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (November 2014) Not oxidized - showing great [R DeAngelo]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (December 2014) Not oxidized - another great bottle [R DeAngelo]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (March 2015) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (July 2015) not oxidized....but corked! (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2015) oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Jan 2016) not oxidized, excellent [ER]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Dec 2010): Not oxidized, good. [KI]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan 2011): Not oxidized, beautiful wine [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Apr 2012): more yellow than usual, but not oxidized, drinking very well [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (July 2013): Not oxidized, this is why we age white burgundy! [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Feb 2011): Darker yellow. No oxidative aromas. Was beautiful. [Wes Jennison]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (August 2014) Still very fresh, classy nose, très bien [ER]
+\\
+===== 2005 =====
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Apr 2013): Not oxidized, excellent [KI]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (April 2014): not oxidized [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Apr 2013): not oxidised and lovely [RB Engel]
+  * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): possibly advanced, definitely clumsy - awkward I hope? [RB Engel]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (April 2016): not oxidized, a little rich but drinking very, very well [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (October 2010) Not oxidised, nice village Puligny [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Dec 2011) Not oxidised, showing well [C North]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Apr 2011) Not oxidized, still very fresh [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Jul 2012): Not oxidized, very nice village [M. Bohm]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Dec 2012) Not oxidized, a bit heavy perhaps [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Mar 2014): not ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Nov 2010): advanced signs of evolution (nose), palate still enjoyable [Thomas Küntziger]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Jun 2011): Not oxidized. Excellent [KI]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (June 2013): Not oxidized, nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Nov 2015): Not oxidized, corked [Adrian Latimer]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2011):Not oxidized. Good. [KI]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (June 2012):Not oxidized, drinking very well [Ben Delancy]
+  * **Puligny Combettes** (Feb 2013):Not oxidized, very Good. [KI]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Jul 2012): Not oxidized, drink now [M. Bohm]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2013): Not oxidized, nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (May 2103) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Perrieres ** (Dec 2013): Not oxidized, nice wine [ER]
+\\
+===== 2006 =====
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Feb 2011) Not oxidised, good wine [Stephane Pierrel]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Jun 2011) Not oxidized [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Nov 2013) Some oxidation? [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (July 2014) Not oxidized, a very good village [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Nov 2011) Not oxidized, needs another 2 years [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Dec 2013) Not oxidized and still young, excellent for a 2006, this guy is a genius [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Dec 2014) Not oxidized, needs another 2 years [ER]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (March 2016) Not oxidized, (Adrian Latimer)
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (Aug 2013) Not oxidized, excellent for a 2006  [ER]
+  * **Puligny Perrieres** (July 2015) Not oxidized, very nice, after 2 hours some 'old chardonnay oxidative notes', but not the nasty sherry type [ER]
+  * Puligny Perrieres (May 2015) Sound, fullbodied Puligny, still some years til it peaks (R Jorgensen)
+  * Puligny Perrieres (September 2015) Fully Mature, no ox. Delicious [P Mesrobian]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2014) Not oxidized, very nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Apr 2015) Not oxidized, very good 06 [Adrian Latimer]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2015) Not oxidized, delicious [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Feb 2017) Not oxidized and delicious [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet **(Feb 2014): Not oxidized, excellent [Will Cashman]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Sep 2015): not oxidized, needs some time still [ER]
+=====   =====
+===== 2007 =====
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Sept 2014) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Aug 2016) not oxidized [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Oct 2016) not oxidized, 2007 all over [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet** (May 2017) not oxidized [MM]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet Combettes** (Oct 2015) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Perrieres** (Oct 2015) not oxidized - terrific (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Perrieres** (Nov 2015) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Perrieres** (July 2016) not oxidized - great bottle (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (Mar 2017): not oxidized, great, almost as good as last week's Perrières 2008 [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (June 2017) Not oxidized, light color, very nice wine [ER]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Dec 2017) Not oxidized, excellent [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (May 2017): not oxidized, light color, très, très bon [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Bâtard-Montrachet** (Jan 2018) Oxidized undrinkable (Suzanne Camhi)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Referts** (Aug 2016): not oxidized, excellent, so much better than last week's village [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Referts** (May, Oct 2017): x 2 - not oxidized, big, young (Adrian Latimer)
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Referts** (July 2017): not oxidized, drinking beautifully [MM]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Referts** (Oct 2017): not oxidized, excellent [ER]
+=====   =====
+===== 2008 =====
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Mar 2014): not ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (April 2015): very fresh and very nice [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (July 2016): not oxidized [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (April 2017): not oxidized, a very nice (mature) Puligny village [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (April 2016): advanced [nlau]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (May 2016): premox [nlau]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet **(Jan 2018): not oxidized, delicious  [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (June 2012): not oxidized. Tension, minerality, fresh. Excellent [droch]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (Feb 2013): slightly advanced [droch]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (Nov 2013): not oxidized [droch]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (Feb 2017): not oxidized, delicious [ER
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrières** (Dec 2017): not oxidized, not as good as the last one [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrieres** (June 2017) not oxidized - excellent (R DeAngelo)
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Sept 2016): not oxidized [ER]
+  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Apr 2017): not oxidized, excellent [ER]
+\\
+===== 2009 =====
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Mar 2014): not ox [RB Engel]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (June 2015): not ox, pretty good for 2009 [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Sept 2016): not ox, nice village [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Dec 2016): premox, no change in colour [ER]
+  * **Puligny Montrachet** (Dec 2016): a superbe village [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Fev 2013): not oxidized. Tension, minerality, fresh and young. Excellent [TSim@rud]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Les Perrieres** (May 2016): not ox, very good. [N. Lau]
+  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (May 2016) not oxidized, très bon [ER]
+  * **Puligny-Montrachet Combettes** (June 2013):Not oxidized, but off bottle. [TSim@rud]
+  * **Puligny Referts** (Aug 2017): not oxidized, nice but a little bit too 2009 for my taste [ER]