Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
chartron_trebuchet [2018/03/14 12:41] |
chartron_trebuchet [2018/03/14 12:41] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ====== Background Information ====== | ||
+ | \\ No background information.\\ \\ | ||
+ | ====== Wines ====== | ||
+ | ====== ====== | ||
+ | ===== 1988 ===== | ||
+ | * **Puligny Folatieres** (Sept 2009): Advanced on the nose, but still fresh to taste. Will be too oxidative for some. Three bottles, consistent notes. [Gareth Miles] | ||
+ | * **Le Montrachet** (Jan 2010) excellent cellar and condition , too oxidative nice sherry....[M.Buttinger] | ||
+ | ===== 1992 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Puligny** **Clos du Cailleret** (Jan 2006): Not oxidised and delicious [pep] | ||
+ | ===== 1996 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2005): no oxidisation problem [Dan Bailey] | ||
+ | ===== 1997 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Puligny** (2005): not a problem [S. Malanga] | ||
+ | ===== 1998 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Puligny Clos du Cailleret** (13 Apr 2005): not oxidised [G. Deschamps] | ||
+ | ===== 2002 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Chassagne-Montrachet Morgeots** (Jan 2006): not oxidised [Bill Nanson] | ||
+ | * **Meursault Charmes** (Feb 2006): not oxidised [Bill Nanson] |