Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
chavy_gerard [2018/03/14 12:41] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Wines ====== | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1995 ===== | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatières**(Apr 2000): not oxidised [Jan-Tore Egge] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatières** (Jun 2003): not perceived of as oxidised, but quite developed [Jan-Tore Egge] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1996 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatières**(Feb 2004): not oxidised [Jan-Tore Egge] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres** (Dec 2006) - heavily oxydized (Odd Rydland) | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== ===== | ||
| + | ===== 1997 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny**(04): Closed and unforthcoming [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(07): Two bottles, badly maderised [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(2001-06): Four bottles, all sound but backward [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(Nov 2006) - no oxidation, but not much more than average [Paul Dellar]. | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres** (28/12/07) - Steely, acidic and backward, but sound [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1998 ===== | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres** (Feb 2006) - 2 bottles no signs of oxidation but one corked [Paul Dellar]http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=63524 | ||
| + | * **Puligny Folatieres** (Feb 2009): not oxidised, excellent [Nick Kernoghan] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Folatieres** (May 2011): oxidised rapidly in the glass [Nick Kernoghan] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Folatieres** (June 2011): not oxidised, very good, but sadly not as good as Feb 2009 [Nick Kernoghan] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1999 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny Les Clavoillons**(2007-08): Three bottles, one slightly maderised, one non-descript, and one very good, minerally with fine structure [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(2005-07): Six bottles, three corked, three acidic, minerally, backward and sound [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(Jan 2007) - minerally, fine, focused (Odd Rydland) | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres** (27/10/09) - Trace of maderisation, palate rather acidic and unformed, future uncertain [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | ===== 2001 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny**(March 2006) - no oxidation [Paul Dellar] http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=74921 | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(Jan 2007) - no problems [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Clavoillon**(Sept 2008) - no oxidation, indeed still quite youthful, but slightly corked [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres** (1/8/08): Steely and austere, needs time [Sam Chafe] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 2002 ===== | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Puligny**(March 2006) - fine [Paul Dellar]http://www.cellartracker.com/wine.asp?iWine=131429 | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(March 2007) - no problems - and coming along well! [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(March 2008) - still fresh, and still improving! [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(July 2008) - fresh and just keeps on getting better [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(Sept 2008) - still fresh, no problems here [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny**(Jan 2009) - no problem at all. [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(Dec 2008) - very youthful, too youthful, needs time to harmonise [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Folatieres**(Jan 2010) - utterly pox-ridden. [Paul Dellar] | ||
| + | * **Puligny Les Champs Gains** (21/12/08): Rich and long, good weight and structure. Fully sound, needs time [Sam Chafe] | ||