Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
coche_dury [2020/05/21 11:13]
jammywine [2008]
coche_dury [2020/05/21 11:30]
jammywine [1999]
Line 77: Line 77:
   * **Meursault** (Aug 2008): Not oxidised. Very good.[Michael Lux]   * **Meursault** (Aug 2008): Not oxidised. Very good.[Michael Lux]
   * **Meursault** **Perrieres** (March 2015): Not oxidized; excellent wine. [Corey Miller]   * **Meursault** **Perrieres** (March 2015): Not oxidized; excellent wine. [Corey Miller]
 +  * **Meursault** (Jan 2020): Tasted 2 bottles, neither are oxidised but one was a bit tired. [Jammy Wine]
 ===== 1998 ===== ===== 1998 =====
  
Line 101: Line 102:
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (28 Apr 2011): Not oxidized and my new all-time favorite Coche Corton [Don Cornwell]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (28 Apr 2011): Not oxidized and my new all-time favorite Coche Corton [Don Cornwell]
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2015): Not oxidized. A full on style, rich yet with the classic Coche acid-mineral core. [Ken Lamb]   * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2015): Not oxidized. A full on style, rich yet with the classic Coche acid-mineral core. [Ken Lamb]
 +  * **Corton Charlemagne** (Nov 2019): Not oxidised, seriously rich. [Jammy Wine]
   * **Meursault** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [Michael Lux]   * **Meursault** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [Michael Lux]
   * **Meursault** (Feb 2010): not oxidized; still young with bracing acidity (MSaviage)   * **Meursault** (Feb 2010): not oxidized; still young with bracing acidity (MSaviage)
  • coche_dury.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/08/31 09:56
  • by rayner.cheung