Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
colin_philippe [2018/03/14 12:41]
127.0.0.1 external edit
colin_philippe [2022/07/17 21:42] (current)
rayner.cheung [2010]
Line 9: Line 9:
   * **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel]   * **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel]
   * **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher]   * **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher]
-\\ **2006**\\ + 
 +===== 2006 ===== 
  
   * **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose]   * **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose]
-\\  \\ **2008**\\ + 
 +===== 2008 ===== 
  
   * **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT]   * **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT]
 +
 +
 +===== 2010 =====
 +
 +  * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jan. 2021 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Needs decanting. Still incredibly primary in the nose & on the palate, with lots of bracing citric mineralité. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Jul. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]
  • colin_philippe.txt
  • Last modified: 2022/07/17 21:42
  • by rayner.cheung