Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
colin_philippe [2018/03/14 12:41] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
colin_philippe [2022/07/17 21:42] (current) rayner.cheung [2010] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel] | * **Chevalier Montrachet **(May 2011): not oxidised, excellent wine [Stephane Pierrel] | ||
* **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher] | * **Chassagne Montrachet Les Chenevottes** (Jan 2012) completely oxidised [Stephen Dreher] | ||
- | \\ **2006**\\ | + | |
+ | ===== 2006 ===== | ||
* **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose] | * **St Aubin Les Combes** (Dec 2012): no oxidation and really freakin good. [Andrew Rose] | ||
- | \\ \\ **2008**\\ | + | |
+ | ===== 2008 ===== | ||
* **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT] | * **Puligny Montrachet Demoiselles **(Oct 2012): no sign of oxidiation but very ready to drink now -- perhaps too ready. Excellent in any case [MLT] | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== 2010 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jan. 2021 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Needs decanting. Still incredibly primary in the nose & on the palate, with lots of bracing citric mineralité. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Jul. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] |