Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

coutoux_michel [2018/03/14 12:41] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Background Information ======
  
 +  * In vintage 1999: batonnage information unknown.
 +  * In vintage 2000: According to Stephen Tanzer (Issue 122) Coutoux feels that this vintage is advancing too rapidly and has thus increased his use of SO2 starting with 2003
 +  * In vintage 2001: According to Stephen Tanzer (Issue 122) Coutox feels this vintage is advancing too rapidly and has thus increased his use of S02 starting with 2003.
 +  * In vintage 2003: Used more S02 than previously (see above) and bottled earlier
 +====== Wines ======
 +\\ 
 +===== 1999 =====
 +
 +  * **Meursault Les Narvaux** (June 2003):Not oxidized; more fruit than terroir but a nice drink [Frank Drew]
 +  * **Meursault Les Narvaux** (July 2003): Two off bottles, oxidized(?) or otherwise [Frank Drew]
 +  * **[[http://​www.cellartracker.com/​wine.asp?​iWine=75863|Meursault Perrieres]]** (Mar 2005): slightly but not fatally oxidized [MJ Packer]
 +  * **[[http://​www.cellartracker.com/​wine.asp?​iWine=75863|Meursault Perrieres]]** (Jul 2005): fatally oxidized [MJ Packer]
 +  * **[[http://​www.cellartracker.com/​wine.asp?​iWine=75863|Meursault Perrieres]]** (Sep 2005): slightly but not fatally oxidized [MJ Packer]
 +\\ 
 +===== 2000 =====
 +
 +  * **Meursault Les Genevrières** (Jul 2006): broad open nose with almonds and hazelnuts, buttery taste, slightly but not yet fatally oxidised. This wine was for a time backward but at the moment develops fast and should be drunk without delay.[P Groen]
 +  * **Puligny Montrachet Les Referts** (Jul 2006): 5 bottles, all fatally oxidized [P Groen]
 +  * **Chassagne Montrachet 1er cru La Maltroie** (Sep 2006): oxidised [P. Groen]
  • coutoux_michel.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/03/14 12:41
  • (external edit)