Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
dauvissat_jean [2018/03/14 12:41] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Background information ====== | ||
| + | \\ No background information.\\ \\ | ||
| + | ====== Wines ====== | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1996 ===== | ||
| + | * **Chablis Saint Pierre** (Feb 1999-Nov 2000): not oxidised, but not particularly inspiring; four bottles drunk in this period [Jan-Tore Egge] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 1998 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chablis Fourchaume** (Feb 2006): a few faint oxidative notes at start, fine later [Bill Nanson] | ||
| + | * **Chablis Les Preuse**s (June. 2011): not oxidized, decent wine [Stuart BH Niemtzow]\\ \\ | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 2000 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chablis Les Preuses** (April 2010); two bottles oxidized (purchased from Vinfolio in 2009) [Ralph Earle] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 2001 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chablis Les Preuse**s (Jan. 2010): not oxidized, quite good [Bill Lawrence] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== 2002 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Chablis Les Preuses** (Mar 2009): not oxidised [Dennis Ward] | ||