Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
dauvissat_vincent [2019/07/25 01:54]
rayner.cheung [2006]
dauvissat_vincent [2019/08/24 00:27]
scamhi [2007]
Line 388: Line 388:
 ===== 2006 ===== ===== 2006 =====
  
-  * **Chablis "Les Clos"​** (Jul. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Youthful in all respects & still quite tight. ​Broding ​magnificence. 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Oct. 2015 (2) & Apr. 2016 (1). [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "Les Clos"​** (Jul. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Youthful in all respects & still quite tight. ​Brooding ​magnificence. 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Oct. 2015 (2) & Apr. 2016 (1). [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Forest**(Apr 2011): not oxidized, good wine [Stephane Pierrel]   * **Chablis Forest**(Apr 2011): not oxidized, good wine [Stephane Pierrel]
   * **Chablis Preuses** (December 2010) oxidized; dark amber, nutty sherry notes. From a 375. [W Taranow]   * **Chablis Preuses** (December 2010) oxidized; dark amber, nutty sherry notes. From a 375. [W Taranow]
Line 419: Line 419:
   * **Chablis Forest** (June 2017) not oxidized - very fresh (R DeAngelo)   * **Chablis Forest** (June 2017) not oxidized - very fresh (R DeAngelo)
   * **Chablis Forest** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)   * **Chablis Forest** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
 +  * **Chablis Preuses** (August 2019) not oxidized and really great (Suzanne Camhi)
   * **Chablis Sechets** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)   * **Chablis Sechets** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo)
 \\  \\ 
Line 439: Line 440:
   * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll]   * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll]
   * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell]
-  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"​** (Sep. 2018 – ): btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent,​ ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"​** (Sep. 2018 – ): btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent,​ ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer)   * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer)
  
  • dauvissat_vincent.txt
  • Last modified: 2024/03/29 05:39
  • by rayner.cheung