Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
dauvissat_vincent [2019/07/25 01:55] rayner.cheung [2006] |
dauvissat_vincent [2019/10/12 18:12] rayner.cheung [2004] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
| * **Chablis Clos**(April 2010): Not oxidized [David Honig] | * **Chablis Clos**(April 2010): Not oxidized [David Honig] | ||
| * **Chablis Clos**(July 2013): Not oxidized [Suzanne Camhi] | * **Chablis Clos**(July 2013): Not oxidized [Suzanne Camhi] | ||
| - | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Mar. 2019): 1 btl not oxidized. Pale to medium yellow color, with youthful flashes of green. Gorgeous wine still very much at its peak thanks to its excellent acidity structure. 2004 is turning out to be the white Burgundy vintage of the decade in terms of both quality & longevity. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Mar. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Pale to medium yellow color, with youthful flashes of green. Gorgeous wine still very much at its peak thanks to its excellent acidity structure. 2004 is turning out to be the white Burgundy vintage of the decade in terms of both quality & longevity. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Chablis Forest**(24 Dec 2005): not oxidized [Carl Steefel] | * **Chablis Forest**(24 Dec 2005): not oxidized [Carl Steefel] | ||
| * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2006): (Vineyard Brands label) not oxidized [Lewis Dawson] | * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2006): (Vineyard Brands label) not oxidized [Lewis Dawson] | ||
| Line 419: | Line 419: | ||
| * **Chablis Forest** (June 2017) not oxidized - very fresh (R DeAngelo) | * **Chablis Forest** (June 2017) not oxidized - very fresh (R DeAngelo) | ||
| * **Chablis Forest** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo) | * **Chablis Forest** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo) | ||
| + | * **Chablis Preuses** (August 2019) not oxidized and really great (Suzanne Camhi) | ||
| * **Chablis Sechets** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo) | * **Chablis Sechets** (Sept 2017) not oxidized (R DeAngelo) | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 439: | Line 440: | ||
| * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll] | * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll] | ||
| * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell] | * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell] | ||
| - | * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 2 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent, ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent, ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer) | * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer) | ||