Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
dauvissat_vincent [2019/11/25 10:45] adrian [2010] |
dauvissat_vincent [2019/12/06 06:47] rayner.cheung [2007] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 402: | Line 402: | ||
| * **Chablis** (May 2017): not at all oxidized; quite young and acidic [Stuart BH Niemtzow] | * **Chablis** (May 2017): not at all oxidized; quite young and acidic [Stuart BH Niemtzow] | ||
| * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT] | * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT] | ||
| - | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 2 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The color, nose, & palate of the good btl all suggested a young, concentrated wine that is perhaps 1 – 2 years from reaching its plateau of maturity. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 3 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The good btls were brilliant, slightly understated, but glorious examples of top notch grand cru Chablis. Their youthful green color, fresh nose, & sensational palate all suggested a wine that is nearing its plateau of maturity with at least 4 years of life ahead. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg] | * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg] | ||
| * **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton] | * **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton] | ||