Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
dauvissat_vincent [2019/11/25 10:45] adrian [2010] |
dauvissat_vincent [2020/01/19 01:58] rayner.cheung [2009] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 402: | Line 402: | ||
* **Chablis** (May 2017): not at all oxidized; quite young and acidic [Stuart BH Niemtzow] | * **Chablis** (May 2017): not at all oxidized; quite young and acidic [Stuart BH Niemtzow] | ||
* **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT] | * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT] | ||
- | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 2 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The color, nose, & palate of the good btl all suggested a young, concentrated wine that is perhaps 1 – 2 years from reaching its plateau of maturity. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 3 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The good btls were brilliant, slightly understated, but glorious examples of top notch grand cru Chablis. Their youthful green color, fresh nose, & sensational palate all suggested a wine that is nearing its plateau of maturity with at least 4 years of life ahead. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg] | * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg] | ||
* **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton] | * **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton] | ||
Line 440: | Line 440: | ||
* **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll] | * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll] | ||
* **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell] | * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell] | ||
- | * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent, ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chablis "Les Preuses"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 5 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent, ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose, & a touch of muskiness in some btls. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer) | * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer) | ||