Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- dauvissat_vincent [2020/02/17 03:27]
doncornwell [2007]
+++ dauvissat_vincent [2020/02/17 03:31]
doncornwell [2007]
@@ Line 403: / Line 403: @@
   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2012): not oxidized. Dauvissat-Camus label. [MLT]
   * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2018 – ): 3 btls oxidized + 1 btl not oxidized. The good btls were brilliant, slightly understated, but glorious examples of top notch grand cru Chablis. Their youthful green color, fresh nose, & sensational palate all suggested a wine that is nearing its plateau of maturity with at least 4 years of life ahead. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Apr. 2016. [Rayner Cheung]
-  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2014–Feb 2020): I owned 36 bottles of this, some with the Dauvissat label, some with Dauvissat-Camus labels, some with the US Vineyard Brands labels (3-4 months less barrel aging), and a lot with French tax capsules.  I still have 2 btls left. Over the last five years I have had one bottle which was oxidized and all of the rest were quite sound. This is really remarkable in comparison with my past experience with Dauvissat and the 2008 and 2009 Clos, where even my initial bottles were oxidized. [Don Cornwell].
+  * **Chablis "Les Clos"** (Sep. 2014–Feb 2020): I purchased 36 bottles of this and have 2 bottles remaining. Six had the US Vineyard Brands labels (3-4 mos less barrel aging). Six had the Dauvissat-Camus labels (US version). The rest had French tax capsules. Over the last five years I have had one bottle which was oxidized and all of the rest were quite sound. This is really remarkable in comparison with my past experience with Dauvissat and the 2008 and 2009 Clos, where even my initial bottles were oxidized. [Don Cornwell].
   * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2010): not oxidized [Alan Weinberg]
   * **Chablis Forest**(July 2011): not oxidized [Thomas Gratton]