Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
dauvissat_vincent [2021/07/09 20:36]
rayner.cheung [2010]
dauvissat_vincent [2021/10/07 14:20]
rayner.cheung [2011]
Line 443: Line 443:
   * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll]   * **Chablis Forest** (September 2011): not oxidized [Stian Gårdsvoll]
   * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Preuses** (March 2017): not oxidized in my judgment but four of the fourteen tasters at the 2009 vintage assessment dinner thought this was advanced. [Don Cornwell]
-  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"​** (Sep. 2018 – ): 10 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent,​ ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water & rosewater in the nose, & a touch of muskiness in some btls. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "Les Preuses"​** (Sep. 2018 – Sep. 2021): 11 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were magnificent,​ ranging from slowly evolving to quite forward. Intriguing elements of orange blossom water, hibiscus, ​& rosewater in the nose, & a touch of muskiness in some btls & citrus pith in others. From a lot of 12 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in May 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer)   * **Sechets** (July 2018): good (Adrian Latimer)
  
Line 453: Line 453:
   * **Chablis "La Forest"​** (Jul. 2021 – ): 1 btl fine. Dauvissat–Camus label. Richer & tighter than the Séchet as of 2021. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2015 [Rayner Cheung]   * **Chablis "La Forest"​** (Jul. 2021 – ): 1 btl fine. Dauvissat–Camus label. Richer & tighter than the Séchet as of 2021. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2015 [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis "​Séchet"​** (May 2021): 1 btl outstanding,​ a step up in power & half a step up in complexity from the village wine.  From a mixed lot of 3 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Aug. 2015 [Rayner Cheung]   * **Chablis "​Séchet"​** (May 2021): 1 btl outstanding,​ a step up in power & half a step up in complexity from the village wine.  From a mixed lot of 3 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Aug. 2015 [Rayner Cheung]
 +  * **Chablis "​Vaillons"​** (Aug. 2021): 1 btl outstanding. The least developed btl from a mixed lot of 3 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Aug. 2015 [Rayner Cheung]
  
 +
 +===== 2011 =====
 +
 +  * **Chablis "La Forest"​** (Mar. 2021 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Best decanted. This is a powerful wine that's worthy of the 2010, but is even more closed (as of 2021). From 2 lots of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Dec. 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
 +
 +  * **Chablis "​Vaillons"​** (Jul. 2021 – ): 2 btls oxidized or advanced + 1 btl not oxidized. Dauvissat–Camus label. From a lot of 6 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Dec. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]
 ===== 2012 ===== ===== 2012 =====
  
   * **Chablis Vaillons** (March 2019): super (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Vaillons** (March 2019): super (Adrian Latimer)
  • dauvissat_vincent.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/10/30 19:43
  • by rayner.cheung