Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
dauvissat_vincent [2019/08/24 00:27]
scamhi [2007]
dauvissat_vincent [2019/11/07 05:54] (current)
rayner.cheung [2004]
Line 334: Line 334:
   * **Chablis Clos**(April 2010): Not oxidized [David Honig]   * **Chablis Clos**(April 2010): Not oxidized [David Honig]
   * **Chablis Clos**(July 2013): Not oxidized [Suzanne Camhi]   * **Chablis Clos**(July 2013): Not oxidized [Suzanne Camhi]
-  * **Chablis "Les Clos"​** (Mar. 2019): ​1 btl not oxidized. Pale to medium yellow color, with youthful flashes of green. Gorgeous wine still very much at its peak thanks to its excellent acidity structure. 2004 is turning out to be the white Burgundy vintage of the decade in terms of both quality & longevity. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2016. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "Les Clos"​** (Mar. 2019, Nov. 2019): ​2 btls not oxidized. Pale to medium yellow color, with youthful flashes of green. Gorgeous wine still very much at its peak thanks to its excellent acidity structure. 2004 is turning out to be the white Burgundy vintage of the decade in terms of both quality & longevity. From a lot of 2 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2016. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Forest**(24 Dec 2005): not oxidized [Carl Steefel]   * **Chablis Forest**(24 Dec 2005): not oxidized [Carl Steefel]
   * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2006): (Vineyard Brands label) not oxidized [Lewis Dawson]   * **Chablis Forest**(Jan 2006): (Vineyard Brands label) not oxidized [Lewis Dawson]
  • dauvissat_vincent.1566599226.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2019/08/24 00:27
  • by scamhi