Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- domaine_leflaive [2022/06/19 23:41]
rayner.cheung [2010]
+++ domaine_leflaive [2022/10/30 02:03] (current)
rayner.cheung [2010]
@@ Line 599: / Line 599: @@
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]
   * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]
-  * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Jun. 2021 – ): 4 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced but drinkable. The good btls had an appropriate palish lemon yellow color. Decanting is recommended as it took > 30 mins to open up & to reveal floral complications to the citrus pith in the nose. Gained weight & sweetness from exotic fruit elements, again after plenty of air. Like the 2010 Pucelles, this wine is still at an early adolescent stage, at least insofar as btls with the right color are concerned. From a lot of 6 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
+  * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Jun. 2021 – Oct. 2022): 5 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced but drinkable. The good btls had an appropriate palish lemon yellow color. Decanting is recommended as it took > 30 mins to open up & to reveal floral complications to the citrus pith in the nose. Gained weight & sweetness from exotic fruit elements, again after plenty of air. Like the 2010 Pucelles, this wine is still at an early adolescent stage, at least insofar as btls with the right color are concerned. From a lot of 6 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Puligny Clavoillon** (Sept 2016): not oxidized but pretty advanced - from magnum no less (R DeAngelo)
   * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud]