Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
domaine_leflaive [2019/07/29 18:11] rayner.cheung [2007] |
domaine_leflaive [2020/05/25 00:02] rayner.cheung [2005] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec. 2008): not oxidized but seemed to fade in the glass [Don Cornwell] | * **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec. 2008): not oxidized but seemed to fade in the glass [Don Cornwell] | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (Jan. 2012): 4 bottles total, 2 oxidized, 2 tired [JasonH] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Jan. 2012): 4 bottles total, 2 oxidized, 2 tired [JasonH] | ||
+ | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Dec 2019): Ex-Domaine. Not oxidised as expected [Jammy Wine] | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
===== 1991 ===== | ===== 1991 ===== | ||
Line 116: | Line 117: | ||
* **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles] | * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles] | ||
* **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks] | * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks] | ||
+ | * **Bourgogne Blanc**(May 2019): Not oxidised, fully mature [Jammy Wine] | ||
* **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell] | * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell] | ||
* **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell] | * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell] | ||
Line 155: | Line 157: | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo] | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo] | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage) | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2020): Not oxidised, very young (Jammy Wine) | ||
===== 1997 ===== | ===== 1997 ===== | ||
Line 175: | Line 178: | ||
* **Batard Montrachet**(July, 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian) | * **Batard Montrachet**(July, 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian) | ||
* **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni) | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni) | ||
+ | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised (Jammy Wine) | ||
* **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach] | * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach] | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell] | * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell] | ||
Line 187: | Line 191: | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka] | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka] | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson] | * **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson] | ||
- | * **Puligny Pucelles**(MAr 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! [Jammy Wine] | + | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Mar 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! [Jammy Wine] |
+ | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jun 2019) Not oxidised. [Jammy Wine] | ||
* **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer) | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
Line 464: | Line 469: | ||
* **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne] | * **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne] | ||
* **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer] | * **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer] | ||
+ | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (May 2020 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Decanted. Pale gold. Fabulously honied nose. The sweetness carried over to the stunningly delicious palate that was bursting with freshness. 14% ABV. From a lot of 2 purchased in Sep. 2013 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
* **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage) | * **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage) | ||
* **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage) | * **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage) | ||
Line 536: | Line 542: | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (10 January 2015): Surprisingly oxidized [M. Premk] | * **Batard Montrachet** (10 January 2015): Surprisingly oxidized [M. Premk] | ||
- | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized + 1 btl advanced. The good btl was simply extraordinary & amazingly light on its feet despite its 14% ABV. Even the advanced one was quite enjoyable. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jun. – Aug. 2019): 1 btl not oxidized + 2 btls oxidized. The good btl was young & utterly delicious, with layers of citrus blossom & white flowers in the nose, & slightly exotic flavors of orchard fruits on the palate. Didn't feel like 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Bourgogne** (April 2012): 1 bottle oxidised, 1 bottle ok. [Magnus Wold Ueland] | * **Bourgogne** (April 2012): 1 bottle oxidised, 1 bottle ok. [Magnus Wold Ueland] | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (12 Nov 2010): Incredibly outstanding bottle of wine [H. Horwitz] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (12 Nov 2010): Incredibly outstanding bottle of wine [H. Horwitz] | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz) | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz) | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ] | ||
- | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019): Not oxidized. Rich, multifacted, mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Jun. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. – Aug. 2019): 2 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btls were rich, multifacted, loaded with dry extract, & mature but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer bet. Jun. 2014 & Dec. 2015. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey] | * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey] | ||
* **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland] | * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland] |