Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
domaine_leflaive [2019/07/29 18:11]
rayner.cheung [2007]
domaine_leflaive [2020/05/25 00:02]
rayner.cheung [2005]
Line 36: Line 36:
   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec. 2008): not oxidized but seemed to fade in the glass [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec. 2008): not oxidized but seemed to fade in the glass [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Jan. 2012): 4 bottles total, 2 oxidized, 2 tired [JasonH]   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Jan. 2012): 4 bottles total, 2 oxidized, 2 tired [JasonH]
 +  * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Dec 2019): Ex-Domaine. Not oxidised as expected [Jammy Wine]
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 1991 ===== ===== 1991 =====
Line 116: Line 117:
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles]
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks]
 +  * **Bourgogne Blanc**(May 2019): Not oxidised, fully mature [Jammy Wine]
   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell]
Line 155: Line 157:
   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo]   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo]
   * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage)   * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage)
 +  * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2020): Not oxidised, very young (Jammy Wine)
 ===== 1997 ===== ===== 1997 =====
  
Line 175: Line 178:
   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)
   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)
 +  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised (Jammy Wine)
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]
Line 187: Line 191:
   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka]   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka]
   * **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson]   * **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson]
-  * **Puligny Pucelles**(MAr 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! [Jammy Wine]+  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Mar 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! ​[Jammy Wine] 
 +  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jun 2019) Not oxidised. ​[Jammy Wine]
   * **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer)
 \\  \\ 
Line 464: Line 469:
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne]
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer]
 +  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (May 2020 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Decanted. Pale gold. Fabulously honied nose. The sweetness carried over to the stunningly delicious palate that was bursting with freshness. 14% ABV. From a lot of 2 purchased in Sep. 2013 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] ​
   * **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage)   * **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage)
   * **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage)   * **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage)
Line 536: Line 542:
  
   * **Batard Montrachet** (10 January 2015): Surprisingly oxidized [M. Premk]   * **Batard Montrachet** (10 January 2015): Surprisingly oxidized [M. Premk]
-  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized + 1 btl advanced. The good btl was simply extraordinary ​amazingly light on its feet despite its 14% ABV. Even the advanced one was quite enjoyable. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jun. – Aug. 2019): 1 btl not oxidized + 2 btls oxidized. The good btl was young utterly delicious, with layers of citrus blossom & white flowers in the nose, & slightly exotic flavors of orchard fruits ​on the palate. Didn't feel like 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Bourgogne** (April 2012): 1 bottle oxidised, 1 bottle ok. [Magnus Wold Ueland]   * **Bourgogne** (April 2012): 1 bottle oxidised, 1 bottle ok. [Magnus Wold Ueland]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (12 Nov 2010): Incredibly outstanding bottle of wine [H. Horwitz]   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (12 Nov 2010): Incredibly outstanding bottle of wine [H. Horwitz]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz)   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz)
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ]   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ]
-  * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019): ​Not oxidized. ​Rich, multifacted, ​mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer ​in Jun. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. – Aug. 2019): ​2 btls not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. ​The good btls were rich, multifacted, ​loaded with dry extract& mature ​but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer ​bet. Jun. 2014 & Dec. 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey]   * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey]
   * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland]   * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland]
  • domaine_leflaive.txt
  • Last modified: 2022/10/30 02:03
  • by rayner.cheung