Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
domaine_leflaive [2019/07/29 18:23] rayner.cheung [2007] |
domaine_leflaive [2019/08/22 02:58] rayner.cheung [2007] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 541: | Line 541: | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz) | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz) | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ] | ||
- | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019): Not oxidized. Rich, multifacted, mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Jun. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. The good btl was rich, multifacted, mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. 4 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer bet. Jun. 2014 & Dec. 2015. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey] | * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey] | ||
* **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland] | * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland] |