Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
domaine_leflaive [2020/05/21 11:45]
jammywine [1998]
domaine_leflaive [2020/05/25 00:00]
rayner.cheung [2005]
Line 117: Line 117:
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): austere, but not oxidised [G Miles]
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Oct 2008): 2 bottles, neither oxidised, drinking well but not improving now [R Brooks]
 +  * **Bourgogne Blanc**(May 2019): Not oxidised, fully mature [Jammy Wine]
   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(21 Nov 2003): not oxidized [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier-Montrachet**(27 Jul 2005): not oxidized, wonderful wine [Don Cornwell]
Line 190: Line 191:
   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka]   * **Puligny Pucelles**(Oct 2011) not oxidized, mature and wonderfully expressive [Ville Viinikka]
   * **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson]   * **Puligny Pucelles**(March 2012) Not oxidized, Multidimensional. Gorgeous. (Alan meadows got this one wrong.) [NTyson]
-  * **Puligny Pucelles**(MAr 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! [Jammy Wine]+  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Mar 2019) Not oxidised. Complex and reductive. Most guessed 2004-09! ​[Jammy Wine] 
 +  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jun 2019) Not oxidised. ​[Jammy Wine]
   * **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Clavoillons** (2 bottles in 2008):not oxidised, but 1 corked! (Adrian Latimer)
 \\  \\ 
Line 467: Line 469:
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (may 8 2012): not oxidised, good fruit and balance, as expected. [Don Osborne]
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (July2017): not oxidised, splendid bottle, hurrah!!. [Adrian Latimer]
 +  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (May 2020 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Decanted. Yellow gold color appropriate. Fabulously honied nose. The sweetness carries over to the the stunningly delicious palate that's bursting with freshness. 14% ABV. From a lot of 2 purchased in Sep. 2013 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] ​
   * **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage)   * **Bourgogne** (Aug 2013): not oxidized; young and fresh; incredibly powerful for a Bourgogne-level wine (MSaviage)
   * **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage)   * **Bourgogne** (Nov 2015): not oxidized; light straw color with great balance of minerality and fruit (Mike Saviage)
  • domaine_leflaive.txt
  • Last modified: 2022/10/30 02:03
  • by rayner.cheung