Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
domaine_leflaive [2020/05/25 00:02] rayner.cheung [2005] |
domaine_leflaive [2020/08/21 18:38] jammywine [1996] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 157: | Line 157: | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo] | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2009) not oxidized - excellent wine [R DeAngelo] | ||
* **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage) | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2010): still incredibly young; no hints of pmox; needs another 5 years (MSaviage) | ||
- | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2020): Not oxidised, very young (Jammy Wine) | + | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Jan 2020): Not oxidised, very young [Jammy Wine] |
+ | * **Puligny Pucelles** (Aug 2020): Another beautiful bottle. Not oxidised. [Jammy Wine] | ||
===== 1997 ===== | ===== 1997 ===== | ||
Line 301: | Line 302: | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (May 2015): not oxidized - very young still [J. Poell] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (May 2015): not oxidized - very young still [J. Poell] | ||
* **Chevalier Montrachet** (June 2015) excellent, very young still [ER] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (June 2015) excellent, very young still [ER] | ||
+ | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (June 2020) Not oxidised [Jammy Wine] | ||
* **Puligny**(Jun 2005): not oxidized [David Chan] | * **Puligny**(Jun 2005): not oxidized [David Chan] | ||
* **Puligny Clavoillon**(Sep 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER] | * **Puligny Clavoillon**(Sep 2005): no signs of oxidation [ER] |