Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
domaine_leflaive [2020/08/21 18:38]
jammywine [1996]
domaine_leflaive [2020/09/08 17:36]
jammywine [2010]
Line 179: Line 179:
   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)
   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)
-  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised ​(Jammy Wine)+  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised ​[Jammy Wine
 +  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Sept 2020): Not oxidised, fresh [Jammy Wine]
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]
Line 589: Line 590:
  
   * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]   * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]
-  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud]+  * **Puligny ​Montrachet ​Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud
 +  * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Sept 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine]
   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]
  • domaine_leflaive.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/09/08 17:36
  • by jammywine