Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
domaine_leflaive [2020/08/21 18:38]
jammywine [1996]
domaine_leflaive [2020/09/08 17:36]
jammywine [2010]
Line 179: Line 179:
   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)   * **Batard Montrachet**(July,​ 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian)
   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni)
-  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised ​(Jammy Wine)+  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised ​[Jammy Wine
 +  * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Sept 2020): Not oxidised, fresh [Jammy Wine]
   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]   * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell]
Line 589: Line 590:
  
   * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]   * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud]
-  * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud]+  * **Puligny ​Montrachet ​Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud
 +  * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Sept 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine]
   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]   * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud]
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger]
  • domaine_leflaive.txt
  • Last modified: 2021/06/19 12:18
  • by rayner.cheung