Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
domaine_leflaive [2020/08/21 18:38] jammywine [1996] |
domaine_leflaive [2021/02/11 12:05] rayner.cheung [2002] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet**(July, 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian) | * **Batard Montrachet**(July, 2011) 2 bottles, neither oxidized. In fact, fantastic. (P Mesrobian) | ||
| * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni) | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet**(March 2011) not oxidized (F Ginanni) | ||
| - | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised (Jammy Wine) | + | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Oct 2019): Not oxidised [Jammy Wine] |
| + | * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (Sept 2020): Not oxidised, fresh [Jammy Wine] | ||
| * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach] | * **Bourgogne Blanc**(Feb 2005): oxidised [T Blach] | ||
| * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell] | * **Chevalier Montrachet**(01 Dec 2005): not at all oxidized, surprisingly good [Don Cornwell] | ||
| Line 374: | Line 375: | ||
| * **Batard-Montrachet**( Q3 and Q4 , 2011 ) : from the same case ( 6-pack ) : first 3 wines opened : all corked ( Herwig Janssen ) | * **Batard-Montrachet**( Q3 and Q4 , 2011 ) : from the same case ( 6-pack ) : first 3 wines opened : all corked ( Herwig Janssen ) | ||
| * **Batard-Montrachet**(May 7, 2011) no sign of oxidation; wonderful wine. [Howard Horwitz] | * **Batard-Montrachet**(May 7, 2011) no sign of oxidation; wonderful wine. [Howard Horwitz] | ||
| - | * **Batard Montrachet** (Apr. 2016, Dec. 2018, ): 2 btls not oxidized. 2016 btl was decanted & showed some reduction; pleasurable but not yet at optimum drinkability. 2018 btl was not decanted & drinking beautifully. Pure class, with sweet white flowers in the nose & exceptional balance on the palate. From a lot of 3 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Batard Montrachet** (Apr. 2016, Dec. 2018, & Feb. 2021): 3 btls not oxidized. 2016 btl was decanted & showed some reduction; pleasurable but not yet at optimum drinkability. 2018 & 2021 btls were not decanted & drinking beautifully. Pure class, with sweet white flowers in the nose. Plenty of zest & exceptional balance on the palate. If only all Leflaive wines from subsequent vintages would age like this … . From a lot of 3 purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2014. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet**(Aug 2005): not oxidised [WK Choy] | * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet**(Aug 2005): not oxidised [WK Choy] | ||
| * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet**(Aug 2005): not oxidised [Jason Heller] | * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet**(Aug 2005): not oxidised [Jason Heller] | ||
| Line 589: | Line 590: | ||
| * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud] | * **Puligny-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud] | ||
| - | * **Puligny Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud] | + | * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Jan 2014): not oxidised [TSim@rud] |
| + | * **Puligny Montrachet Pucelles**(Sept 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine] | ||
| * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud] | * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud] | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger] | * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger] | ||