Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
domaine_leflaive [2022/06/19 23:39] rayner.cheung [2010] |
domaine_leflaive [2022/06/19 23:41] rayner.cheung [2010] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 595: | Line 595: | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger] | * **Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2013); no oxidation and a stunning tight wine[R Younger] | ||
| * **Batard Montrachet** (Feb 2014); no oxidation and very young[TSim@rud] | * **Batard Montrachet** (Feb 2014); no oxidation and very young[TSim@rud] | ||
| - | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Nov. 2021 – Jun. 2022): 1 btl borderline oxidized + 1 btl fine. The good btl was pale to medium gold, with a floral nose complicated by mineralité. On the palate, a taste of dried peaches, citrus peel, & minerals. From a lot of 2 purchased in May 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Nov. 2021 – Jun. 2022): 1 btl borderline oxidized + 1 btl fine. The good btl was pale to medium gold, with a floral nose complicated by mineralité. On the palate, a taste of dried peaches, citrus peel, & minerals. Similar in style to the 2005, but less sweet & less powerful. 13% ABV. From a lot of 2 purchased in May 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] |
| * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud] | * **Bienvenue Batard-Montrachet** (Feb 2014): not oxidized. [TSim@rud] | ||
| * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud] | * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Feb 2014): no oxidation. [TSim@rud] | ||