Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
domaine_leflaive [2019/07/29 18:23]
rayner.cheung [2007]
domaine_leflaive [2019/08/22 02:58] (current)
rayner.cheung [2007]
Line 541: Line 541:
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz)   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (30 April 2015): Excellent showing with no signs of oxidation [H. Horwitz)
   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ]   * **Chevalier Montrachet** (Oct 2016): Lovely, no hint of oxidation and great colour [RBE_NZ]
-  * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019): ​Not oxidized. ​Rich, multifacted,​ mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. Purchased ​from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer ​in Jun. 2014. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chevalier–Montrachet** (Jun. 2019 â€“ ): 1 btl not oxidized + 1 btl oxidized. ​The good btl was rich, multifacted,​ mature, but sensational. 14% ABV. 4 btls purchased ​from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer ​bet. Jun. 2014 & Dec. 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey]   * **Macon Verze** (December 2010): 2 bottles (Bottles 7 and 8 of my original case) too oxidized to be drinkable. Purchased on release and stored perfectly since then. [Daniel Bailey]
   * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland]   * **Macon Verze** (April 2012): not oxidised [Magnus Wold Ueland]
  • domaine_leflaive.1564417403.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2019/07/29 18:23
  • by rayner.cheung