Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

fetl_pillot [2018/03/14 12:41]
fetl_pillot [2018/03/14 12:41] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Background Information ======
  
 +  * In vintage 2010: abandoned natural cork and converted to DIAM closures
 +===== Wines =====
 +==== 1996 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne 1er Cru Les Grandes Ruchottes**(Oct 2010) badly oxidised [I. Hickman]
 +  * **Chassagne 1er Cru Les Grandes Ruchottes** (Dec 2010) even worse than the previous bottle [I. Hickman]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse** (April 2013): Mature, gold color, but not oxicized. Nice wine [A Fenster]
 +==== 1998 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse**(Dec 2007): badly oxidized [K.T.]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse**(Jan 2008): badly oxidized [K.T.]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse** (Jan 2008): very mature, but not oxydized, good wine [K.T.]
 +==== 1999 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne Grandes Ruchottes**(Nov 2007): very good wine, not oxydized [K.T.]
 +  * **Chassagne Grandes Ruchottes**(Aug 2011): initially seemed good, but oxidised rapidly [Nick Kernoghan]
 +  * **Chassagne Grandes Ruchottes** (Apr 2012): not oxidised, very good [Nick Kernoghan]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse**(28 Feb 2007): not oxidized -- see related tasting notes [Don Cornwell]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse**(Nov 2011): not oxidised, very good [Nick Kernoghan]
 +  * **Chassagne Vide Bourse** (Feb 2012): not oxidized, very good [Nick Kernoghan]
 +==== 2000 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne Morgeot** (Nov 2008) Magnum; not oxidized [David Honig]
 +\\ 
 +==== 2001 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne Morgeot** (May 2013) not oxidized very nice wine (R DeAngelo)
 +==== 2002 ====
 +
 +  * **Chassagne Grandes Ruchottes** (Feb 2010): not oxidized [Jake Hartinger]
 +\\  2008\\ ​
 +
 +  * Chassange Grandes Ruchottes (april 2015): Beautiful, mature, crisp wine. Not a hint of oxidizion. Taste twice. (R. Jorgensen)
  • fetl_pillot.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/03/14 12:41
  • (external edit)