Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
fevre [2019/06/01 10:59]
adrian [‍‍‍2007]
fevre [2020/03/29 00:28]
doncornwell [‍‍‍Background information]
Line 3: Line 3:
   * Vintage 2006: Along with sister-estate Bouchard has state of the art bottling line that excludes oxygen. Goal for free SO2 at bottling is 40 ppm.   * Vintage 2006: Along with sister-estate Bouchard has state of the art bottling line that excludes oxygen. Goal for free SO2 at bottling is 40 ppm.
   * Vintage 2007: Along with Bouchard, now uses only unbleached corks coated with paraffin only (no silicone). For the petit chablis, village chablis and all 375 ml bottlings regardless of level they are now using a "high quality synthetic cork" (diam)   * Vintage 2007: Along with Bouchard, now uses only unbleached corks coated with paraffin only (no silicone). For the petit chablis, village chablis and all 375 ml bottlings regardless of level they are now using a "high quality synthetic cork" (diam)
-  * Vintage 2009: Along with sister winery Bouchard, has now eliminated natural cork closures ​and is using DIAM exclusively.+  * Vintage 2009: All wines switched to DIAM closures ​except for grand crus. 
 +  * Vintage 2010: All wines (including grand crus) bottled under DIAM.
 ====== ‍‍‍Wines ====== ====== ‍‍‍Wines ======
 \\  \\ 
Line 475: Line 476:
   * **Chablis Bougros** ( May 2016) oxidised! bummer[b.henry]   * **Chablis Bougros** ( May 2016) oxidised! bummer[b.henry]
   * **Chablis Bougros** ( March 2017) very nice [b.henry]   * **Chablis Bougros** ( March 2017) very nice [b.henry]
-  *  **Chablis Bougros** ( March 2019) ok[Adrian Latimer]+  *  **Chablis Bougros** ( March 2019) ok [Adrian Latimer]
   * **Chablis Clos** (September 2010) Not Oxidized, excellent [Leah Amir]   * **Chablis Clos** (September 2010) Not Oxidized, excellent [Leah Amir]
   * **Chablis Clos** ( July 10,2012) 2 bottles, 1 corked badly, other not oxidised ( b. henry)   * **Chablis Clos** ( July 10,2012) 2 bottles, 1 corked badly, other not oxidised ( b. henry)
Line 491: Line 492:
   * **Chablis Preuses** (January 2017): Over the past 4 years I have opened 11 bottles. About half have been oxidized - several were undrinkable (KentM)   * **Chablis Preuses** (January 2017): Over the past 4 years I have opened 11 bottles. About half have been oxidized - several were undrinkable (KentM)
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Feb 2019): bright yellow, nice Chablis nose but palate flat, drying, still drinkable (just) but definitely too advanced (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Valmur** (Feb 2019): bright yellow, nice Chablis nose but palate flat, drying, still drinkable (just) but definitely too advanced (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Chablis Vaudesir** (August 2019): totally oxidized, dead [Adrian Latimer]
 +  * **Chablis Preuses** (August 2019): good, young, austere [Adrian Latimer]
 +
 +
 \\  \\ 
 ==== ‍‍‍**2009** ==== ==== ‍‍‍**2009** ====
Line 506: Line 511:
  
   * **Chablis Bougros** (Oct 2015): not oxidized, young, very fine [Adrian Latimer]   * **Chablis Bougros** (Oct 2015): not oxidized, young, very fine [Adrian Latimer]
 +
 +
 +==== ‍‍‍**2011** ====
 +
 +  * **Chablis Mt de Milieu** (Mar 2020): not oxidized, austere [Adrian Latimer]
 +
 +==== ‍‍‍**2012** ====
 +
 +  * **Chablis Fourchaume** (Nov 2019): not oxidized, bit austere still [Adrian Latimer]
  • fevre.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/08/22 17:38
  • by jammywine