Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
fevre [2020/03/29 00:27]
doncornwell
fevre [2020/08/22 17:38]
jammywine [‍‍‍1997]
Line 4: Line 4:
   * Vintage 2007: Along with Bouchard, now uses only unbleached corks coated with paraffin only (no silicone). For the petit chablis, village chablis and all 375 ml bottlings regardless of level they are now using a "high quality synthetic cork" (diam)   * Vintage 2007: Along with Bouchard, now uses only unbleached corks coated with paraffin only (no silicone). For the petit chablis, village chablis and all 375 ml bottlings regardless of level they are now using a "high quality synthetic cork" (diam)
   * Vintage 2009: All wines switched to DIAM closures except for grand crus.   * Vintage 2009: All wines switched to DIAM closures except for grand crus.
-  * Vintage 2010: All bottles ​(including grand crus) bottled under DIAM.+  * Vintage 2010: All wines (including grand crus) bottled under DIAM.
 ====== ‍‍‍Wines ====== ====== ‍‍‍Wines ======
 \\  \\ 
Line 13: Line 13:
  
   * **Chablis Preuses** (19 Nov 2006): slight oxidation but not spoiled [P Sidebotham]   * **Chablis Preuses** (19 Nov 2006): slight oxidation but not spoiled [P Sidebotham]
 +  * **Chablis Preuses** (Aug 2020): Oxidised but drinkable, advanced [Jammy Wine]
   * **Chablis Bougros** (between 2008 and 2010): six bottles, four completely shot, one barely drinkable and one marvellous [Stephan Bauer]   * **Chablis Bougros** (between 2008 and 2010): six bottles, four completely shot, one barely drinkable and one marvellous [Stephan Bauer]
 ===== ‍‍‍1998 ===== ===== ‍‍‍1998 =====
Line 269: Line 270:
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (June & July 2010): not oxidized, very good for 03 [Adrian Latimer]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (June & July 2010): not oxidized, very good for 03 [Adrian Latimer]
   * **Chablis Vaudesir** (17 Jan 2010): BADLY oxidized; possibly questionable provenance too. [David McMahon]   * **Chablis Vaudesir** (17 Jan 2010): BADLY oxidized; possibly questionable provenance too. [David McMahon]
-===== ‍‍‍**2004** =====+=====2004=====
  
   * **Chablis Bougros** (July 2011): Advanced (Daniel Posner)   * **Chablis Bougros** (July 2011): Advanced (Daniel Posner)
Line 494: Line 495:
   * **Chablis Vaudesir** (August 2019): totally oxidized, dead [Adrian Latimer]   * **Chablis Vaudesir** (August 2019): totally oxidized, dead [Adrian Latimer]
   * **Chablis Preuses** (August 2019): good, young, austere [Adrian Latimer]   * **Chablis Preuses** (August 2019): good, young, austere [Adrian Latimer]
 +  *  **Chablis Bougros Cote Bougerots** ( March 2020) oxidised [Adrian Latimer]
  
  
Line 507: Line 509:
   * **Chablis Vaulorent** (Aug 2014): Not oxidized [R Younger]   * **Chablis Vaulorent** (Aug 2014): Not oxidized [R Younger]
   * **Chablis Le Lys** (September 2014): not oxidized. Very powerful nose. (Christian Seger)   * **Chablis Le Lys** (September 2014): not oxidized. Very powerful nose. (Christian Seger)
 +  * **Chablis Valmur/​Preuses** (April 2020): no pox, young and quite austere for 09s (Adrian Latimer)
 \\  \\ 
 ==== ‍‍‍**2010** ==== ==== ‍‍‍**2010** ====
  • fevre.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/08/22 17:38
  • by jammywine