Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

guffens_heynen [2018/03/14 12:41]
guffens_heynen [2018/03/14 12:41] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +===== 1995 =====
  
 +  * **Pouilly-Fuissé Premier Jus** (Nov 2005): Not oxidized, very bright, terrific wine [Frank Drew]
 +===== 1996 =====
 +
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (Sept 2005): Not oxidized, fresh, bright, some oak, still on the young side [Frank Drew]
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (March 2008): Not oxidized, good bottle in spite of s.o.s. [Frank Drew]
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (Sept 2008): Not oxidized, quite fresh and very good [Frank Drew]
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (July 2009): Not oxidized, very good bottle, unbleached cork [Frank Drew]
 +  * **Pouilly-Fuissé Les Croux** (Sept 2006): Not oxidized, probably good wine but, sadly, corked [Frank Drew]
 +\\ 
 +===== 1997 =====
 +
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (March 2006). One bottle completely gone. Another bottle sampled several nights latter was fine. (S. Malanga)
 +\\ 
 +===== 2000 =====
 +
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos En Chavigne** (April 2008). Prematurely oxidized [Rico Chan]
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos En Chavigne** (Sept 2008). Not Oxidized [Rico Chan]
 +\\ 
 +===== 2002 =====
 +
 +  * **Pouilly-Fuissé La Roche** (March 2009. Not oxidized, lovely, balanced, intense, precise, persistent [Steve Stearns]
 +\\ 
 +===== 2008 =====
 +
 +  * **Macon-Pierreclos Le Chavigne** (14 Oct 2012): Not oxidized, fine [Gilles Huygen]
 +  * Pouilly Fuissé "La Roche" (25 sept. 2015): Slightly oxidized, very golden in color, a lot of baked apple on the nose. Not very appealing overall. (François Rosenfeld)
  • guffens_heynen.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/03/14 12:41
  • (external edit)