Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
latour_giraud [2018/03/14 12:41] 127.0.0.1 external edit |
latour_giraud [2018/04/05 22:55] roumegaire |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* **Meursault Les Narvaux**(July 2010): Not at all oxidized; sensational, extremely fresh, wonderful bottle [Frank Drew] | * **Meursault Les Narvaux**(July 2010): Not at all oxidized; sensational, extremely fresh, wonderful bottle [Frank Drew] | ||
* **Meursault Perrieres** (24 Jan 2006): not oxidised [G Deschamps] | * **Meursault Perrieres** (24 Jan 2006): not oxidised [G Deschamps] | ||
- | ===== **1997** ===== | + | ===== 1997 ===== |
* **Puligny Champs Canet** (14 April 2007): 2 bottles, both very badly oxidised [Garry Clark] | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (14 April 2007): 2 bottles, both very badly oxidised [Garry Clark] | ||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* **Meursault Perrieres** (July 2016) not oxidized and pretty darn good! (R DeAngelo) | * **Meursault Perrieres** (July 2016) not oxidized and pretty darn good! (R DeAngelo) | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | ===== **2002** ===== | + | ===== 2002 ===== |
* **Meursault Charmes**(1 Jan 2008): not oxidized, but early maturing [J. Prandi] | * **Meursault Charmes**(1 Jan 2008): not oxidized, but early maturing [J. Prandi] | ||
Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
* **Meursault Perrieres**(March-May 2009): Four bottles, all oxidized to varying degrees; completely unlike the 2000 vintage cited above [David Honig] | * **Meursault Perrieres**(March-May 2009): Four bottles, all oxidized to varying degrees; completely unlike the 2000 vintage cited above [David Honig] | ||
* **Meursault Perrieres** (March 2010): not oxidized exactly, but drinking nicely in a mature way with some tertiary notes. Medium intense golden core, with distinct clearing at the edge.I know this isn't the most exalted domaine, nor do I have extensive experience with their wines, but should it be this advanced? [Mike de Lange] | * **Meursault Perrieres** (March 2010): not oxidized exactly, but drinking nicely in a mature way with some tertiary notes. Medium intense golden core, with distinct clearing at the edge.I know this isn't the most exalted domaine, nor do I have extensive experience with their wines, but should it be this advanced? [Mike de Lange] | ||
- | ===== **2004** ===== | + | ===== 2004 ===== |
* **Meursault** **Genevrieres**(Sept 2010): Not oxidized, but mature. [David Honig] | * **Meursault** **Genevrieres**(Sept 2010): Not oxidized, but mature. [David Honig] | ||
Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
* **Meursault Genevrieres** (July 2016): Still very young and tight, with quite a bit of sulfur. Built for the long-haul [C. Jang] | * **Meursault Genevrieres** (July 2016): Still very young and tight, with quite a bit of sulfur. Built for the long-haul [C. Jang] | ||
* **Meursault Genevrieres** **'Cuvee des Pierre'** (December 2016): Even fresher and and younger than the regular Genevrieres. [C. Jang] | * **Meursault Genevrieres** **'Cuvee des Pierre'** (December 2016): Even fresher and and younger than the regular Genevrieres. [C. Jang] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== 2013 ===== | ||
+ | * **Meursault Charmes** (April 2018) lovely nose, no problems yet![b.henry] |