Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
latour_giraud [2018/04/05 02:26] wino55 [2010] |
latour_giraud [2018/04/05 22:55] roumegaire |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| * **Meursault Les Narvaux**(July 2010): Not at all oxidized; sensational, extremely fresh, wonderful bottle [Frank Drew] | * **Meursault Les Narvaux**(July 2010): Not at all oxidized; sensational, extremely fresh, wonderful bottle [Frank Drew] | ||
| * **Meursault Perrieres** (24 Jan 2006): not oxidised [G Deschamps] | * **Meursault Perrieres** (24 Jan 2006): not oxidised [G Deschamps] | ||
| - | ===== **1997** ===== | + | ===== 1997 ===== |
| * **Puligny Champs Canet** (14 April 2007): 2 bottles, both very badly oxidised [Garry Clark] | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (14 April 2007): 2 bottles, both very badly oxidised [Garry Clark] | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| * **Meursault Perrieres** (July 2016) not oxidized and pretty darn good! (R DeAngelo) | * **Meursault Perrieres** (July 2016) not oxidized and pretty darn good! (R DeAngelo) | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | ===== **2002** ===== | + | ===== 2002 ===== |
| * **Meursault Charmes**(1 Jan 2008): not oxidized, but early maturing [J. Prandi] | * **Meursault Charmes**(1 Jan 2008): not oxidized, but early maturing [J. Prandi] | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| * **Meursault Perrieres**(March-May 2009): Four bottles, all oxidized to varying degrees; completely unlike the 2000 vintage cited above [David Honig] | * **Meursault Perrieres**(March-May 2009): Four bottles, all oxidized to varying degrees; completely unlike the 2000 vintage cited above [David Honig] | ||
| * **Meursault Perrieres** (March 2010): not oxidized exactly, but drinking nicely in a mature way with some tertiary notes. Medium intense golden core, with distinct clearing at the edge.I know this isn't the most exalted domaine, nor do I have extensive experience with their wines, but should it be this advanced? [Mike de Lange] | * **Meursault Perrieres** (March 2010): not oxidized exactly, but drinking nicely in a mature way with some tertiary notes. Medium intense golden core, with distinct clearing at the edge.I know this isn't the most exalted domaine, nor do I have extensive experience with their wines, but should it be this advanced? [Mike de Lange] | ||
| - | ===== **2004** ===== | + | ===== 2004 ===== |
| * **Meursault** **Genevrieres**(Sept 2010): Not oxidized, but mature. [David Honig] | * **Meursault** **Genevrieres**(Sept 2010): Not oxidized, but mature. [David Honig] | ||
| Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| * **Meursault Genevrieres** **'Cuvee des Pierre'** (December 2016): Even fresher and and younger than the regular Genevrieres. [C. Jang] | * **Meursault Genevrieres** **'Cuvee des Pierre'** (December 2016): Even fresher and and younger than the regular Genevrieres. [C. Jang] | ||
| - | + | ===== 2013 ===== | |
| - | **2013** | + | * **Meursault Charmes** (April 2018) lovely nose, no problems yet![b.henry] |
| - | Meursault Charmes (April 2018) lovely nose, no problems yet![b.henry] | + | |