Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
pernot [2019/05/04 18:44] rayner.cheung [2009] |
pernot [2019/05/09 02:50] rayner.cheung [2009] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 180: | Line 180: | ||
| * **Bienvenues- Batard Montrachet** ( Dec 2016) excellent, no problems here [b.henry] | * **Bienvenues- Batard Montrachet** ( Dec 2016) excellent, no problems here [b.henry] | ||
| * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Folatières"** (Nov. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized. Quite pale yellow color. Somewhat austere & reduced. Best decanted, allowing the floral elements to emerge. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. This wine has barely evolved since its purchase, at which time a trial btl was consumed. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Folatières"** (Nov. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized. Quite pale yellow color. Somewhat austere & reduced. Best decanted, allowing the floral elements to emerge. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. This wine has barely evolved since its purchase, at which time a trial btl was consumed. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
| - | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"** (Dec. 2018 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Slightly riper than the Folatières, but still quite reduced with an indistinct nose & a modestly pleasurable palate. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Pucelles"** (Dec. 2018 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Riper than the Folatières, with a classically Burgundian nose that turns floral, almost like a top Condrieu. White–fleshed fruits on the palate that is quite lovely. From 6 btls purchased in Apr. 2011 from a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] |