Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- potel [2018/03/14 12:41]
+++ potel [2018/03/14 12:41] (current)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+===== Background Information =====
+  * In vintage 2004: per Allen Meadows-a severe //débourbage//, very little //bâtonnage// and only one racking right before preparing for the //mise//, which includes fining and a light filtration.
+\\
+===== Wines =====
+\\
+===== 1982 =====
+  * **Puligny Montrachet 1er Cru Les Combettes** (Dec 2010**)** Not oxidised or tired but not really singing. A good but not great bottle. Note Sélection Nicolas Potel bottling. [Regan McCaffery]
+\\
+===== 1985 =====
+  * **Puligny Montrachet 1er Cru Les Combettes** (Sep 2010) No hint of oxidation over 5 hours, really fantastic. Note Sélection Nicolas Potel bottling. [Regan McCaffery]
+=====   =====
+=====   =====
+===== 1999 =====
+\\
+  * **Chassagne Montrachet 1er Cru** (Aug 2012) Multi-vineyard 1er cru. Mild oxidation, drinkable but uninteresting (even the 2007 Bourgogne was better). [WL]
+=====   =====
+===== 2002 =====
+\\
+  * **St Aubin Les Charmois** (Aug 2006) : No problem [Paul Dellar]
+  * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Aug 2012) Mild oxidation, drinkable but uninteresting. [WL]
+\\
+===== 2003 =====
+\\
+  * **Chassagne Montrachet 1er Cru Morgeot** (Sep 2009) 3 bottles in a row all oxidised. [Regan McCaffery]
+===== 2005 =====
+\\
+  * **Meursault Perrieres** (Aug 2012) 3 bottles purchased on release- not oxidized- tight [R Younger]
+  * **Meursault Poruzots** (Feb 2014) No premox (Adrian Latimer)