Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
prieur [2018/03/14 17:22]
roumegaire
prieur [2018/05/12 19:40]
joelsinger
Line 1: Line 1:
-Test rapide 
- 
 ====== Background information ====== ====== Background information ======
 \\  \\ 
Line 44: Line 42:
   * **Puligny Combettes** (August 2009): Disappointing - as a previous bottle drunk a year ago was very, very good. This one had golden colour. [Kent M]   * **Puligny Combettes** (August 2009): Disappointing - as a previous bottle drunk a year ago was very, very good. This one had golden colour. [Kent M]
 \\  \\ 
-===== **2004** =====+===== 2004 =====
  
   * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan. 2010): dark and oxidised [JF Zarama]   * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan. 2010): dark and oxidised [JF Zarama]
-\\ **2005**\\ +===== 2005===== 
  
-  * Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont (Apr 2015): nice color but oxidized. snif!+  ​* **Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont** (Apr 2015): nice color but oxidized. snif!
   * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2017): Totally oxidized. Sad. (D. Attick)   * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2017): Totally oxidized. Sad. (D. Attick)
 +
 +===== 2009===== ​
 +
 +  * **Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont** (Nov. 2017 - May 2018): Three bottles - two were drinking well with the exuberant fruit of the vintage; one was oxidized and bordering on undrinkable (Joel Singer)
  • prieur.txt
  • Last modified: 2018/05/12 19:40
  • by joelsinger