Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
prieur [2018/03/14 17:22] roumegaire |
prieur [2020/05/21 11:21] (current) jammywine [2002] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | Test rapide | ||
| - | |||
| ====== Background information ====== | ====== Background information ====== | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| Line 43: | Line 41: | ||
| * **Puligny Combettes** (Feb 2010) Hollow, fading. [Kent M] | * **Puligny Combettes** (Feb 2010) Hollow, fading. [Kent M] | ||
| * **Puligny Combettes** (August 2009): Disappointing - as a previous bottle drunk a year ago was very, very good. This one had golden colour. [Kent M] | * **Puligny Combettes** (August 2009): Disappointing - as a previous bottle drunk a year ago was very, very good. This one had golden colour. [Kent M] | ||
| + | * **Montrachet** (Jan 2020): Oxidised [Jammy Wine] | ||
| \\ | \\ | ||
| - | ===== **2004** ===== | + | ===== 2004 ===== |
| * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan. 2010): dark and oxidised [JF Zarama] | * **Puligny Combettes** (Jan. 2010): dark and oxidised [JF Zarama] | ||
| - | \\ **2005**\\ | + | ===== 2005===== |
| - | * Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont (Apr 2015): nice color but oxidized. snif! | + | * **Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont** (Apr 2015): nice color but oxidized. snif! |
| * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2017): Totally oxidized. Sad. (D. Attick) | * **Corton Charlemagne** (April 2017): Totally oxidized. Sad. (D. Attick) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== 2009===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Beaune Premier Cru, Champs-Pimont** (Nov. 2017 - May 2018): Three bottles - two were drinking well with the exuberant fruit of the vintage; one was oxidized and bordering on undrinkable (Joel Singer) | ||