Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
ramonet [2023/11/05 06:18]
rayner.cheung [2002]
ramonet [2023/11/05 06:20] (current)
rayner.cheung [2002]
Line 328: Line 328:
   * **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy]   * **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy]
   * **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell]   * **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell]
-  * **Montrachet** (Nov. 2023): Dark gold. Nose very ripe. Less advanced on the palate, saved by the wine's firm acid spine. Got better with air. Served by a close friend & fellow collector with impeccable sourcing. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Montrachet** (Nov. 2023): Dark gold. Nose very ripe. Less advanced on the palate, saved by the wine's firm acid spine. Got better with air. Served by a generous & close friend & fellow collector with impeccable sourcing. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger]   * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger]
   * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well   * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well
  • ramonet.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/11/05 06:20
  • by rayner.cheung