Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
ramonet [2018/10/12 13:07]
adrian [2008]
ramonet [2019/09/17 03:06]
adrian [2005]
Line 235: Line 235:
   * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(May 2011) Oxidized [Ville Viinikka]   * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(May 2011) Oxidized [Ville Viinikka]
   * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(Oct 2011): not oxidized, drinking great [Ville Viinikka]   * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(Oct 2011): not oxidized, drinking great [Ville Viinikka]
 +  * **Chassagne Ruchottes**(July 2019): oxidized [Suzanne Camhi]
   * **Chassagne Vergers**(Aug 2003): not oxidised [WK Choy]   * **Chassagne Vergers**(Aug 2003): not oxidised [WK Choy]
   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec 2008): not oxidized, impressive but not up to 99 or 02 level [Don Cornwell]   * **Chevalier Montrachet**(10 Dec 2008): not oxidized, impressive but not up to 99 or 02 level [Don Cornwell]
Line 353: Line 354:
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau]
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel]
-  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau]+  ​* **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Sep 2019): Splendid. (Adrian Latimer)  
 +  *  ​* **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau]
   * **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson]   * **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson]
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg]
Line 377: Line 379:
   * **Chassagne Boudriotte**(Oct 2018): ​ Not oxidized, good. [Adrian Latimer]   * **Chassagne Boudriotte**(Oct 2018): ​ Not oxidized, good. [Adrian Latimer]
   * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (March 2011) not oxidized [Stephane Pierrel]   * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (March 2011) not oxidized [Stephane Pierrel]
 +  * **Batard Montrachet**(July 2019): brilliant (Adrian Latimer)
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 2008 ===== ===== 2008 =====
Line 397: Line 400:
   * **Puligny Enseigneres** (Apr 2015): No premox, nice, round and ripe (Mike Saviage)   * **Puligny Enseigneres** (Apr 2015): No premox, nice, round and ripe (Mike Saviage)
   * **Chassagne Morgeots** (October 2016): No premox, beautiful, young and fresh (Christopher Bonnard)   * **Chassagne Morgeots** (October 2016): No premox, beautiful, young and fresh (Christopher Bonnard)
 +  * **Chassagne Morgeots** (May 2019): No premox, but very (too) 09 ripe (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Chassagne Boudriotte** (June 2019): No premox, but also very (too) 09 ripe (Adrian Latimer)
 +
 +
 \\  \\ 
 ===== 2011 ===== ===== 2011 =====
Line 402: Line 409:
   * **Chassagne Ruchottes** (Apr 2015): Young and fresh (Mike Saviage)   * **Chassagne Ruchottes** (Apr 2015): Young and fresh (Mike Saviage)
   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (July 2016) - really great. No oxidation. [Howard Cooper]   * **Bienvenue Batard Montrachet** (July 2016) - really great. No oxidation. [Howard Cooper]
-  * **Chassagne ​Caillertes** (Feb 2018) - young no pox (Adrian Latimer)+  * **Chassagne ​Caillerets** (Feb 2018) - young no pox (Adrian Latimer) 
 +  * **Chassagne Ruchottes** (Feb 2019): big, young, no pox, very good (Adrian Latimer)
  • ramonet.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/05/21 11:36
  • by jammywine