Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
ramonet [2019/07/19 22:39]
scamhi [2000]
ramonet [2020/05/21 11:35]
jammywine
Line 31: Line 31:
   * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep 2007): two bottles, neither oxidized [Don Cornwell]   * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep 2007): two bottles, neither oxidized [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chassagne Morgeot** (5 May 2005): no sign of oxidation [David Klinger]   * **Chassagne Morgeot** (5 May 2005): no sign of oxidation [David Klinger]
 +===== 1987 =====
 +
 +  * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2019): Not oxidised but fully mature. [Jammy Wine]
 ===== 1988 ===== ===== 1988 =====
  
Line 354: Line 357:
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau]
   * **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel]   * **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel]
-  * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau]+  ​* **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Sep 2019): Splendid. (Adrian Latimer)  
 +  *  ​* **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau]
   * **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson]   * **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson]
   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg]   * **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg]
  • ramonet.txt
  • Last modified: 2023/11/05 06:20
  • by rayner.cheung