Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
ramonet [2019/07/19 22:39] scamhi [2000] |
ramonet [2020/05/21 11:35] jammywine |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
* **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep 2007): two bottles, neither oxidized [Don Cornwell] | * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (25 Sep 2007): two bottles, neither oxidized [Don Cornwell] | ||
* **Chassagne Morgeot** (5 May 2005): no sign of oxidation [David Klinger] | * **Chassagne Morgeot** (5 May 2005): no sign of oxidation [David Klinger] | ||
+ | ===== 1987 ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **Bienvenues-Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2019): Not oxidised but fully mature. [Jammy Wine] | ||
===== 1988 ===== | ===== 1988 ===== | ||
Line 354: | Line 357: | ||
* **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau] | * **Batard-Montrachet** (Nov 2014) no oxidation. [N. Lau] | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel] | * **Batard Montrachet** (Nov 2014): Not a hint of oxidation. Too young and rambunctious though. [RB Engel] | ||
- | * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau] | + | * **Bienvenues Batard Montrachet** (Sep 2019): Splendid. (Adrian Latimer) |
+ | * * **Puligny-Montrachet Champs Canet** (Jan 2015) some oxidation, blew off by mid dinner. @blue ribbon sushi. [N. Lau] | ||
* **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson] | * **St. Aubin - Charmois** (February 2013) Not oxidized. Perfectly pleasant [NTyson] | ||
* **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg] | * **Batard-Montrachet** (Mar 2016) Not oxidized, a very nice but not amazing wine. [Alan Weinberg] |