Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
ramonet [2023/11/05 06:18] rayner.cheung [2002] |
ramonet [2023/11/05 06:20] (current) rayner.cheung [2002] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 328: | Line 328: | ||
* **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy] | * **Montrachet**(August 2009): Not oxidised [WK Choy] | ||
* **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell] | * **Montrachet**(4 Mar 2010): Not oxidized but excessively minty on the palate. Hope this bottle is an aberration. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night Three [Don Cornwell] | ||
- | * **Montrachet** (Nov. 2023): Dark gold. Nose very ripe. Less advanced on the palate, saved by the wine's firm acid spine. Got better with air. Served by a close friend & fellow collector with impeccable sourcing. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Montrachet** (Nov. 2023): Dark gold. Nose very ripe. Less advanced on the palate, saved by the wine's firm acid spine. Got better with air. Served by a generous & close friend & fellow collector with impeccable sourcing. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger] | * **Puligny** **Enseignères** (Dec 2007) not oxidized. cork appears unbleached [David Klinger] | ||
* **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (Mar 2013): Not oxidised and drinking very well |