Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| — |
rapet [2018/03/14 12:41] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ===== 1998 ===== | ||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (16/10/08): early maderisation, fairly coloured, disappointing [Sam Chafe]. | ||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (18/6/09): better colour, soft, no backbone, not maderised but undistinguished [Sam Chafe]. | ||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (Aug 2016): Not oxidized--quite nice, one of the best '98 whites I've drunk [AT Bridge] | ||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ===== **1999** ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne:** (May 2010) not oxidized, excellent condition [Bill Lawrence] | ||
| + | ===== ===== | ||
| + | ===== **2001** ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne**: (2/28/2009): not oxidized: good light gold color: good acidity and outstanding wine from a lower level producer (Keith Akers) | ||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne**: (3/20/2009): not oxidized: blue tinged cork, golden color at first, got lighter with air. Bottle came off as more mature then previous (Keith Akers) | ||
| + | ===== 2006 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (Aug 2014): magnum not oxidized and perhaps best CC of 20 tasted same day [R Younger] | ||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (Sept 2014): not oxidized [R Younger] | ||
| + | ===== 2009 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (May 2014): Not oxidized [R Younger] | ||
| + | ===== 2011 ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * **Corton Charlemagne** (Aug 2014): Tight and not oxidized [R Younger] | ||