Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
raveneau [2018/03/14 14:19]
roumegaire
raveneau [2019/12/11 09:09]
rayner.cheung [2003]
Line 79: Line 79:
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Oct 2006): Not oxidised, but not for futher keeping. Excelent, complex Chablis [Lars Simonsen]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Oct 2006): Not oxidised, but not for futher keeping. Excelent, complex Chablis [Lars Simonsen]
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (07 April 2008): remarkably fresh and complex - no oxidation. (I. Hickman)   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (07 April 2008): remarkably fresh and complex - no oxidation. (I. Hickman)
 +  * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Aug 2019): in Chablis. ​ Getting austere aged 22(!) but no sign of oxidation. ​ (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Montmains** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [JE Simond]* Chablis Montmains (Dec 2006): Not oxidized [Wes Jennison]   * **Chablis Montmains** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [JE Simond]* Chablis Montmains (Dec 2006): Not oxidized [Wes Jennison]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Dec 2005): not oxidised, great wine [JE Simond]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Dec 2005): not oxidised, great wine [JE Simond]
Line 89: Line 90:
   * **Chablis Foret** (May 2013): not oxidized, very good [N. Lau]   * **Chablis Foret** (May 2013): not oxidized, very good [N. Lau]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (24 May 2010): not oxidised [Gregg Ushiroda]   * **Chablis Valmur** (24 May 2010): not oxidised [Gregg Ushiroda]
 +  * **Chablis Valmur** (14 March 2019): not oxidised, in good shape [Suzanne Camhi]
 ===== 1999 ===== ===== 1999 =====
  
Line 127: Line 129:
   * **Chablis Blanchots** (8 Feb 2011): not oxidized. See 95-2000 Retrospective Tasting Notes. [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Blanchots** (8 Feb 2011): not oxidized. See 95-2000 Retrospective Tasting Notes. [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chablis Blanchots** (29 Jun 2011): not oxidized but disappointing for Raveneau in a great Chablis vintage. [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Blanchots** (29 Jun 2011): not oxidized but disappointing for Raveneau in a great Chablis vintage. [Don Cornwell]
-  * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Jul. 2017 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. Still in its adolescence. More citrus peel & fruit stones in the nose than white flowers. Charming to taste. From a lot of 4 purchased in Nov. 2015 from Kermit Lynch Wine Merchant (library release by the domaine).+  * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Jul. 2017 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. Still in its adolescence. More citrus peel & fruit stones in the nose than white flowers. Charming to taste. From a lot of 4 purchased in Nov. 2015 from Kermit Lynch Wine Merchant (library release by the domaine).
   * **Chablis Butteaux** (Sep-Dec 2006): Several bottles, quite variable. 2 young and racy bottles, 3 open and soft and showing 1st signs of oxidation, 2 bottles very advanced and beginning to oxidize. (J. Gilman)   * **Chablis Butteaux** (Sep-Dec 2006): Several bottles, quite variable. 2 young and racy bottles, 3 open and soft and showing 1st signs of oxidation, 2 bottles very advanced and beginning to oxidize. (J. Gilman)
   * **Chablis Butteaux** (Oct 07 - Feb 10): Six bottles, all fresh and youthful [David Honig]   * **Chablis Butteaux** (Oct 07 - Feb 10): Six bottles, all fresh and youthful [David Honig]
Line 206: Line 208:
   * **Chablis Blanchots** (4 Feb 2010): not oxidized and excellent. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night One [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Blanchots** (4 Feb 2010): not oxidized and excellent. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night One [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chablis Blanchots** (Dec 2012): not oxidized, excellent [MLT]   * **Chablis Blanchots** (Dec 2012): not oxidized, excellent [MLT]
 +  * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Nov. 2018): Not oxidized. Youthfully pale yellow color. White flowers & subtle oak in the nose. Highly refined palate with good persistence. Purchased in May 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Butteaux** (May 2005): not oxidised [WK Choy]   * **Chablis Butteaux** (May 2005): not oxidised [WK Choy]
   * **Chablis Butteaux** (19 Nov 2005): not oxidised [G Deschamps]   * **Chablis Butteaux** (19 Nov 2005): not oxidised [G Deschamps]
Line 219: Line 222:
   * **Chablis Clos** (4 Feb 2010): not oxidized and super wine. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night One [Don Cornwell]   * **Chablis Clos** (4 Feb 2010): not oxidized and super wine. See 2002 Tasting Notes, Night One [Don Cornwell]
   * **Chablis Clos** (July 2010): not oxidized, brilliant wine. Still a baby [Stephen Williams]   * **Chablis Clos** (July 2010): not oxidized, brilliant wine. Still a baby [Stephen Williams]
 +  * **Chablis Les Clos** (March 2018): Tour d'​Argent - brilliant (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (23 Jan 2006): not oxidised, showing very well [G Deschamps]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (23 Jan 2006): not oxidised, showing very well [G Deschamps]
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Mar 2007): not oxidized, young intense wine [Joe Durnell]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Mar 2007): not oxidized, young intense wine [Joe Durnell]
Line 240: Line 244:
   * **Chablis Valmur** (May 2011): Not oxidized, nice bottle [Stephane Pierrel]   * **Chablis Valmur** (May 2011): Not oxidized, nice bottle [Stephane Pierrel]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jan 2015): no signs of oxidation, magnificent [ER]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jan 2015): no signs of oxidation, magnificent [ER]
-  * \\ +  * **Chablis "​Valmur"​** (Jan. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidzed. Light to medium yellow. Still youthfully backward, with phenomenal concentration. The nose eventually shows hints of white flowers & orchard fruits. Citrus & minerals predominate on the tight palate. Quite a contrast to the Blanchot. From a lot of 2 purchased in Sep. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
 ===== 2003 ===== ===== 2003 =====
  
   * **Chablis Blanchots** (Nov 2011): Not oxidized, surprisingly good for a 2003 [MLT]   * **Chablis Blanchots** (Nov 2011): Not oxidized, surprisingly good for a 2003 [MLT]
-  * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Feb. 2015 – ): btls not oxidized. Still very primary & youthful in 2015; reaching its plateau of drinkability in 2018. Probably better decanted. No traces of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2013 + 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung] +  * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Feb. 2015 – Jul. 2018): btls not oxidized. Still very primary & youthful in 2015; reaching its plateau of drinkability in 2018. Probably better decanted. No traces of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2013 + 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung] 
-  * **Chablis Clos** (Feb 2010): very 2003 but no signs of oxidation [ER]\\ **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Nov 8, 2009): magnum; not oxidized; very nice [Gregg Ushiroda]+  * **Chablis Clos** (Feb 2010): very 2003 but no signs of oxidation [ER] 
 +  * **Chablis "​Clos"​** (Mar. 2019 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. A gem of a wine from a difficult vintage. Best decanted. Not as much depth or power as in more regular vintages, but there are sweet white flowers in the nose, together with delicate minerality & surprisingly colorful texture on the palate. From a lot of 3 purchased in Apr. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] 
 +  * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Nov 8, 2009): magnum; not oxidized; very nice [Gregg Ushiroda]
   * **Chablis** **Montee de Tonnerre** (May 2012):no signs of oxidation, NOT very 2003 it was lean not flabby [Suzanne Camhi]   * **Chablis** **Montee de Tonnerre** (May 2012):no signs of oxidation, NOT very 2003 it was lean not flabby [Suzanne Camhi]
   * **Chablis "​Vaillons"​** (Feb. 2016 – Dec. 2016): 4 btls not oxidized. Pale yellow. Better decanted to remove the earthy/​wheaty aromas associated with this heatwave vintage. Somewhat lighter in the nose & on the palate than other vintages. 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch & 2 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer, all in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Chablis "​Vaillons"​** (Feb. 2016 – Dec. 2016): 4 btls not oxidized. Pale yellow. Better decanted to remove the earthy/​wheaty aromas associated with this heatwave vintage. Somewhat lighter in the nose & on the palate than other vintages. 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch & 2 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer, all in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
Line 251: Line 257:
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Oct 2011): A clumsy wine, but no signs of oxidation [NTyson]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Oct 2011): A clumsy wine, but no signs of oxidation [NTyson]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (April 2014): no premox but a bit too 2003 [A.Latimer]   * **Chablis Valmur** (April 2014): no premox but a bit too 2003 [A.Latimer]
-  * **Chablis "​Valmur"​** (Dec. 2016 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. ​Decanted. Gorgeous. Classic Raveneau nose of sweet white flowers. No hint of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). Precise, dry flavors on the palate. From a lot of 4 purchased in Mar. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "​Valmur"​** (Dec. 2016 – ): 3 btls not oxidized. ​Better decanted and/or served from a glass with a wide bowl. Gorgeous. Classic Raveneau nose of sweet white flowers. No hint of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). Precise, dry flavors on the palate. From a lot of 4 purchased in Mar. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jun 2017): Not oxidized. Initially premox nose but blew off @ Jewel Bako [N. Lau]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jun 2017): Not oxidized. Initially premox nose but blew off @ Jewel Bako [N. Lau]
   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2014): not oxidized, but quite 2003. (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2014): not oxidized, but quite 2003. (Adrian Latimer)
Line 300: Line 306:
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Sept 2014): not oxidized. Exquisite. (Kent M)   * **Chablis Valmur** (Sept 2014): not oxidized. Exquisite. (Kent M)
 \\  \\ 
-===== **2008** =====+===== 2008 =====
  
   * **Chablis Foret** (Feb 2015): not oxidized [N. Lau]   * **Chablis Foret** (Feb 2015): not oxidized [N. Lau]
Line 307: Line 313:
 ===== 2009 ===== ===== 2009 =====
  
-  * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Feb 2017): very fine & young [Adrian Latimer]+  * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Feb 2017, April 2018): no problems[Adrian Latimer] 
 +  * **Chablis Butteaux**(Dec 2018, June 2019): 2 x very fine (Adrian Latimer) 
 +  * **Chablis Valmur** (May 2018): fine (Adrian Latimer) 
 + 
 +===== 2011 ===== 
 +  * **Chablis Chapelot** (June 2019): no problems[Adrian Latimer] 
  • raveneau.txt
  • Last modified: 2020/03/01 01:51
  • by rayner.cheung