Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
raveneau [2019/03/15 12:39]
rayner.cheung [2003]
raveneau [2020/01/02 05:54] (current)
rayner.cheung [2003]
Line 79: Line 79:
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Oct 2006): Not oxidised, but not for futher keeping. Excelent, complex Chablis [Lars Simonsen]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Oct 2006): Not oxidised, but not for futher keeping. Excelent, complex Chablis [Lars Simonsen]
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (07 April 2008): remarkably fresh and complex - no oxidation. (I. Hickman)   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (07 April 2008): remarkably fresh and complex - no oxidation. (I. Hickman)
 +  * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Aug 2019): in Chablis. ​ Getting austere aged 22(!) but no sign of oxidation. ​ (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Montmains** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [JE Simond]* Chablis Montmains (Dec 2006): Not oxidized [Wes Jennison]   * **Chablis Montmains** (Dec 2005): not oxidised [JE Simond]* Chablis Montmains (Dec 2006): Not oxidized [Wes Jennison]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Dec 2005): not oxidised, great wine [JE Simond]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Dec 2005): not oxidised, great wine [JE Simond]
Line 89: Line 90:
   * **Chablis Foret** (May 2013): not oxidized, very good [N. Lau]   * **Chablis Foret** (May 2013): not oxidized, very good [N. Lau]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (24 May 2010): not oxidised [Gregg Ushiroda]   * **Chablis Valmur** (24 May 2010): not oxidised [Gregg Ushiroda]
 +  * **Chablis Valmur** (14 March 2019): not oxidised, in good shape [Suzanne Camhi]
 ===== 1999 ===== ===== 1999 =====
  
Line 248: Line 250:
   * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Feb. 2015 – Jul. 2018): 5 btls not oxidized. Still very primary & youthful in 2015; reaching its plateau of drinkability in 2018. Probably better decanted. No traces of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2013 + 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Chablis "​Blanchot"​** (Feb. 2015 – Jul. 2018): 5 btls not oxidized. Still very primary & youthful in 2015; reaching its plateau of drinkability in 2018. Probably better decanted. No traces of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). 3 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Nov. 2013 + 2 btls purchased from Kermit Lynch in early 2015. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Clos** (Feb 2010): very 2003 but no signs of oxidation [ER]   * **Chablis Clos** (Feb 2010): very 2003 but no signs of oxidation [ER]
-  * **Chablis "​Clos"​** (Mar. 2019 – ): 1 btl not oxidized. A gem of a wine from a difficult vintage. Not as much depth or power as in better behaved ​vintages, but the sweet white flowers in the nose delicate minerality on the palate ​are all there. From a lot of 3 purchased in Apr. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "​Clos"​** (Mar. 2019 – ): 2 btls not oxidized. A gem of a wine from a difficult vintage. Best decanted. Not as much depth or power as in more regular ​vintages, but there are sweet white flowers in the nose, together with delicate minerality ​& surprisingly colorful texture ​on the palate. From a lot of 3 purchased in Apr. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Nov 8, 2009): magnum; not oxidized; very nice [Gregg Ushiroda]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Nov 8, 2009): magnum; not oxidized; very nice [Gregg Ushiroda]
   * **Chablis** **Montee de Tonnerre** (May 2012):no signs of oxidation, NOT very 2003 it was lean not flabby [Suzanne Camhi]   * **Chablis** **Montee de Tonnerre** (May 2012):no signs of oxidation, NOT very 2003 it was lean not flabby [Suzanne Camhi]
Line 255: Line 257:
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Oct 2011): A clumsy wine, but no signs of oxidation [NTyson]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Oct 2011): A clumsy wine, but no signs of oxidation [NTyson]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (April 2014): no premox but a bit too 2003 [A.Latimer]   * **Chablis Valmur** (April 2014): no premox but a bit too 2003 [A.Latimer]
-  * **Chablis "​Valmur"​** (Dec. 2016 – ): btls not oxidized. Better decanted. Gorgeous. Classic Raveneau nose of sweet white flowers. No hint of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). Precise, dry flavors on the palate. From a lot of 4 purchased in Mar. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Chablis "​Valmur"​** (Dec. 2016 – Jan. 2020): btls not oxidized. Better decanted ​and/or served from a glass with a wide bowl. Gorgeous. Classic Raveneau nose of sweet white flowers. No hint of "​2003"​ vintage traits (q.v. the comments on 2003 Vaillons). Precise, dry flavors on the palate. From a lot of 4 purchased in Mar. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jun 2017): Not oxidized. Initially premox nose but blew off @ Jewel Bako [N. Lau]   * **Chablis Valmur** (Jun 2017): Not oxidized. Initially premox nose but blew off @ Jewel Bako [N. Lau]
   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2014): not oxidized, but quite 2003. (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Clos** (Dec 2014): not oxidized, but quite 2003. (Adrian Latimer)
Line 312: Line 314:
  
   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Feb 2017, April 2018): no problems[Adrian Latimer]   * **Chablis Montee de Tonnerre** (Feb 2017, April 2018): no problems[Adrian Latimer]
-  * **Chablis Butteaux**(Dec 2018): very fine (Adrian Latimer)+  * **Chablis Butteaux**(Dec 2018, June 2019): 2 x very fine (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Chablis Valmur** (May 2018): fine (Adrian Latimer)   * **Chablis Valmur** (May 2018): fine (Adrian Latimer)
 +
 +===== 2011 =====
 +  * **Chablis Chapelot** (June 2019): no problems[Adrian Latimer]
 +
  • raveneau.1552649946.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2019/03/15 12:39
  • by rayner.cheung