Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
sauzet [2019/04/15 20:51] rayner.cheung [2005] |
sauzet [2019/11/09 00:37] rayner.cheung [2006] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | ||
- | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 4 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather stiff grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – Nov. 2019): 7 btls not oxidized. Better decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
* **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
Line 350: | Line 350: | ||
* **Puligny Champ-Canet** (May 2013): not oxidized, youthful and fresh [droch] | * **Puligny Champ-Canet** (May 2013): not oxidized, youthful and fresh [droch] | ||
* **Puligny Combettes** (March 2016): One oxidized and one ok (possibly slightly advanced) [Kevin Harvey] | * **Puligny Combettes** (March 2016): One oxidized and one ok (possibly slightly advanced) [Kevin Harvey] | ||
- | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Jun. 2018 – ): 3 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced but still drinkable. Not decanted. The good btls are youthful, but the elements are coming together beautifully. Just–ripe citrus in the nose carries over to the palate, which is complicated by a tantalizing interplay between refreshing acidity & sweet fruit. At least 1 btl delivered an astonishing surge of flavor in the finish with nut oils, preserved lemon, & salted caramel that was reminiscent of New World Chardonnay. From 2 lots of 6 purchased in Dec. 2013 & Jul. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Jun. 2018 – ): 5 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced but still drinkable. Better decanted. The good btls are youthful, but the elements are coming together beautifully. Just–ripe citrus in the nose carries over to the palate, which is complicated by a tantalizing interplay between refreshing acidity & sweet fruit. At least 1 btl delivered an astonishing surge of flavor in the finish with nut oils, preserved lemon, & salted caramel that was reminiscent of New World Chardonnay. From 2 lots of 6 purchased in Dec. 2013 & Jul. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Puligny Referts** (June 2018): fine, high acidity (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Referts** (June 2018): fine, high acidity (Adrian Latimer) | ||
* **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Referts"** (Aug. 2018 – Jan. 2019): 2 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced. The good btls are half a notch down from the Combettes in terms of power & complexity, but all of the same elements are there: a lemony bouquet that's easy on the senses continues on to the palate where sweetness from the fruit provides exceptional balance. From a lot of 3 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Referts"** (Aug. 2018 – Jan. 2019): 2 btls not oxidized + 1 btl advanced. The good btls are half a notch down from the Combettes in terms of power & complexity, but all of the same elements are there: a lemony bouquet that's easy on the senses continues on to the palate where sweetness from the fruit provides exceptional balance. From a lot of 3 purchased in Aug. 2015 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
* **Puligny Garenne** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, good [Adrian Latimer] | * **Puligny Garenne** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, good [Adrian Latimer] | ||
- | * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2018): not oxidized [Adrian Latimer] | + | * **Puligny Perrieres** (Oct 2018, May 2019): not oxidized, both lovely [Adrian Latimer] |
* **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Combettes** (Oct 2018): not oxidized, but fruit seems subdued, bit disappointing for what it is. way outshone by a 2008 Chassagne Caillerets from Ramonet. Advanced? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
* **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | * **Puligny Garenne** (Jan 2019): not oxidized, lovely [Adrian Latimer] | ||
+ | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019): not oxidized, taught, mineral, austere, super (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Combettes** (May 2019): after the Referts & Perrieres. Another odd bottle, the darkest colour (just) of the 3. No obvious pox, but just tatses of caramel, flat, no fruit or minerality or lift. Very advanced - certainly way below par (again)? (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Combettes** (June 2019): 3rd time lucky & quite a difference, tight, dense, very citrus, youngish (Adrian Latimer) | ||
===== 2009 ===== | ===== 2009 ===== | ||
* **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
+ | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ |