Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
sauzet [2019/07/18 18:36] rayner.cheung [2008] |
sauzet [2019/07/27 09:06] adrian [2009] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 311: | Line 311: | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer) | ||
* **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer] | ||
- | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 5 btls not oxidized. Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather stiff grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] | + | * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. Better decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung] |
* **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
* **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung] | ||
Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
* **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
* **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ | * **Puligny Garenne** (July 2019) very nice (Adrian Latimer) | ||
+ |