Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
sauzet [2019/07/21 20:07]
rayner.cheung
sauzet [2019/07/24 08:14]
adrian [2009]
Line 311: Line 311:
   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)   * **Batard Montrachet** (April 2017): still quite young (Adrian Latimer)
   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]   * **Batard Montrachet** (June 2016): not oxidized, big, heavy, quite young [Adrian Latimer]
-  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. ​Not decanted. Quite massive, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]+  * **Bâtard–Montrachet** (Mar. 2018 – ): 6 btls not oxidized. ​Better ​decanted. Quite monolithic, but more enjoyable than the BBV. 1 btl (Dec. 2018) had a lot of wood in the nose but wasn't corked or otherwise compromised. Somehow, the Sauzet 1er crus from this vintage have been more memorable than the rather foursquare grand crus. 7 btls purchased from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer in Sep. 2014 (1) + Apr. 2015 (6). [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Bienvenues–Bâtard–Montrachet** (Jan. 2018): Not oxidized. Deep gold. Not decanted. Somewhat reticent initially, but both the nose & the palate developed nicely in the glass. The 2004 is much more charming; this one was a bit four–square. Purchased in Mar. 2014 at retail in Tokyo. [Rayner Cheung]
   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]   * **Puligny–Montrachet "Les Combettes"​** (Nov. 2015 – Dec. 2017): 8 btls not oxidized + 1 corked. One good btl had just a hint of honied maturity in the nose. Other good btls had a younger aromatic & flavor profile, with some quinine–like astringency on the palate. Best served decanted. From 9 btls purchased in Jan. 2014 from the auction platform of a reputable West Coast retailer. [Rayner Cheung]
Line 365: Line 365:
   * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry]   * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry]
   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)   * **Puligny Referts** (May 2019) no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good (Adrian Latimer)
 +  * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer)
  • sauzet.txt
  • Last modified: 2019/09/02 11:40
  • by adrian