Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
sauzet [2019/12/26 09:48] adrian [2009] |
sauzet [2019/12/27 09:40] adrian [2009] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
| * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | * **Puligny Folatieries** ( Nov 2016) no premox, very lean wine [b.henry] | ||
| * **Puligny Referts** (May,Dec 2019) 1st no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good, 2nd in December nice aromatics, similar but finish completely flat and dead, drinkable but advanced. If 1st bottle would score 91-2 this would be 90... (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Referts** (May,Dec 2019) 1st no premox, not too 09 ripe, very good, 2nd in December nice aromatics, similar but finish completely flat and dead, drinkable but advanced. If 1st bottle would score 91-2 this would be 90... (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| - | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July 2019) no premox (Adrian Latimer) | + | * **Puligny Champs Canet** (July, Dec 2019) no premox, that makes 6 ten year old 1e crus drunk this year, one a bit tired but none premoxed and 5 on very good form. Glimmer of optimism?! (Adrian Latimer) |
| * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Garenne** (July, Sept 2019) both very nice (Adrian Latimer) | ||
| * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2019) again no premox, not too 09 ripe, lovely (Adrian Latimer) | * **Puligny Perrieres** (Dec 2019) again no premox, not too 09 ripe, lovely (Adrian Latimer) | ||